Yes, you are correct Copper, this is an outdated pole... However, imo, it wouldn't be necessary to add the George Anthony theory because the evidence has proven this theory to be quite ridiculous. There was absolutely no evidence of either, and the judge wouldn't even permit them to mention it in closing arguments because of it... Fca is a proven pathological liar, and her defense team sunk to a level that no one, including the much more dignified prosecution team, thought would ever get past any jury. But these 12 folks had no clue they were supposed to connect the dots, and/or look at the evidence. Had they reviewed it, they would've realized Caylee never drowned, and how absurd it was to believe George was involved. The stars lined up for that defense, it was the only way they could've secured that impossible verdict.
Imo, there's plenty of evidence that may sway you, and prove fca's guilt, as well as, debunk the george/drowning theory... If you're interested, the following link is a good place start (or google foolproof suffocation):
Post # 1085
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...ny-s-Computer-Forensics&p=8223072#post8223072
All jmo.