Softail
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
- Messages
- 12,513
- Reaction score
- -8
According to "Response to State of Florida's Motion in Limine",
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27597438/detail.html
We know that they were looking to use the MHE's in the guilt phase of the trial.
BUT - They say in this motion filed 4/18 (yesterday):
Because Dr. Danzinger and Dr. Weitz have both been removed from the guilt phase of the trial, the reports and express contents of will not be introduced at trial. However, the events referenced in the reports, which were gleaned through interviews with Ms. Anthony, are admissible as subject matter germane to the theory of the defense.
Is it just me? or do these sentences contradict each other? :waitasec: How can the reports and contents not be introduced at trial, but events referenced in the reports can be? More word gymnastics to get this in? :waitasec: :dunno:
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/27597438/detail.html
We know that they were looking to use the MHE's in the guilt phase of the trial.
BUT - They say in this motion filed 4/18 (yesterday):
Because Dr. Danzinger and Dr. Weitz have both been removed from the guilt phase of the trial, the reports and express contents of will not be introduced at trial. However, the events referenced in the reports, which were gleaned through interviews with Ms. Anthony, are admissible as subject matter germane to the theory of the defense.
Is it just me? or do these sentences contradict each other? :waitasec: How can the reports and contents not be introduced at trial, but events referenced in the reports can be? More word gymnastics to get this in? :waitasec: :dunno: