What questions are still unanswered?

[gngr~snap]

I think where they're going with the appeal is...as long as it's active, she can take the 5th on the civil suits in consideration of the criminal charges pending. Otherwise why do it...as the public will find it appalling and she is out anyway?

OK, if you think George is in on it then I must admit you've now lost me - I don't believe that for a second.

No I really don't anymore.- well a cover/cleanup maybe but not disposal.
If he had disposed of Caylee she'd never be found.
Profile for women and dead children-
Goes something like this.
Caylee was disposed as typically a "woman" would do. can't find the link
Women place body within 1-2 mile radius of home swaddled in blankets and often placed in water or a "womb" like enviornment. water creek...?
men I think typicaly do it different
unless a man makes it look like a woman did it then....
need to go to bed.fftobed:
I'm useless with no links.

 

[Controversialist]

As I think about it more, you make some sense - in that they included the lying to law enforcement charges...why not add neglect? However, I'm not sure there was any evidence of it...?? Even if she didn't report her missing for 31 days - my understanding is that does not technically/legally qualify as neglect (hence the push for Caylee's law). It would be interesting to hear what the prosecution would say on this issue...

Great points here. One of our attorneys (AZ) in the "legal answers" thread noted (as I understand) that the jury could have found ICA guilty of Charge Three if the jury had believed the pool story.

Then the jury could have decided two things:

[] Would ICA's 911 call have helped Caylee, and
[] Would ICA have known this beforehand.

IMO both these points would be provable beyond a reasonable doubt. As you noted, I would love to ask the SA's what they think the jury should have done with Charge Three.

:juggle::juggle::juggle:

 

[Wendy101]

I think the only way the Jury could come up with the verdict they did is that they think George killed Caylee.. and KC was covering for Geroge..

OR maybe the think Cindy killed Caylee and George and KC covered for her...

Who knows.. they ALL lied.

 

[HatesSociopaths]

Honestly, none of my questions about this case were answered by the trial.
In fact, more questions were raised for me, as I had never heard the tapes, never heard of many of the witnesses, etc...the vibe between members of the Anthony family is beyond understanding and I DO understand the issue of dealing with a "sociopath" as so many have labeled Casey, it goes beyond that. Something was very wrong in that household, Lee seems to have the emotional age of a 12-yr old boy and Casey a 10-yr old girl. What happened to halt their emotional growth?

One thing to know about sociopaths is that family and associates become cowed, sick, mentally ill and driven crazy (institutional) by their association with the sociopath. They are confused, accident prone and make mistakes. They live in a dangerous environment, made unsafe by the sociopath.

JB is next.

 

[HatesSociopaths]

CA seems very upset and looks so remorseful, IMO...

I think the theory is that she used the chloroform to get Caylee to sleep...and one time it killed Caylee...

Her parents rescued her in the cover up of Caylee's death.

I think Casey was maybe molested by her father, which is why no father was ever produced for Caylee...

This is my theory.

I hope one day we will all know the real truth!

George and Lee were both tested - not the father.

 

[pcrum12]

George and Lee were both tested - not the father.

Doesn't mean the Anthony's knew that prior to LE involvement. Could have not wanted test for fear of confirming that LA or GA was the father. The Anthony's could have feared that one of them was and didn't want to find out. JMO

 

[NotRocketSighence]

George and Lee were both tested - not the father.

Was it ever stated why George and Lee were paternity tested and when? There was no DNA to rule them out of as far as I know and the allegations of molestation (or sorts) didn't come til later.

 

[HatesSociopaths]

Doesn't mean the Anthony's knew that prior to LE involvement. Could have not wanted test for fear of confirming that LA or GA was the father. The Anthony's could have feared that one of them was and didn't want to find out. JMO

There is no evidence of molestation, other than a pathological liar trying to deflect attention away from the fact she murdered her baby.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk

 

[pcrum12]

There is no evidence of molestation, other than a pathological liar trying to deflect attention away from the fact she murdered her baby.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk

NO evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen. It just means no evidence. JMO

 

[Mystic]

George and Lee were both tested - not the father.

FYI there was no paternity test.. at Trial JA confirmed that they do not do these tests. There was DNA testing of all the A's as part of effectively investigating the scene. From that DNA they could tell that Lee was not the father (and therefore neither would GA be).

It was in the latter part of the trial.

 

[HatesSociopaths]

NO evidence doesn't mean it didn't happen. It just means no evidence. JMO

Lots of ways one could speculate. Caylee could have been abducted by aliens.

She never told her boyfriends about any molestation, other than a feeling up incident with LA.

She told Cookie in jail letter about GA, setting the stage for court case. It is easy for me to see it was a fabrication.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk

 

[cluciano63]

Lots of ways one could speculate. Caylee could have been abducted by aliens.

She never told her boyfriends about any molestation, other than a feeling up incident with LA.

She told Cookie in jail letter about GA, setting the stage for court case. It is easy for me to see it was a fabrication.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk

That is your opinion. I am not so sure. I think that some sexual activity was taking place within that household at some point, other than between George and Cindy. JMO

 

[KMouse]

I was trying to remember the tweets and reports that were coming out during the trial.

Did the jurors ever shed a tear when pictures of Caylee's remains were shown or any other time?

 

[KMouse]

That is your opinion. I am not so sure. I think that some sexual activity was taking place within that household at some point, other than between George and Cindy. JMO

I've had some fleeting thoughts on this....
Casey is all me, me, me
she has a history of being promiscuous.
she has a few screws loose.

If there was anything between Casey and Lee it wouldn't surprise me if she initiated it.

 

[NotRocketSighence]

If we take this out of the Anthony realm for a moment. Many many molestation victims never speak out. Many keep their secret out of fear, shame and a whole host of negative feelings and emotions. One of the biggest is they wont be believed.

Outside of irrefutable DNA evidence which isn't likely after all these years, therapist testimony (doctor patient privileged?) friends you confide in testifying (hearsay?) What exactly other evidence is there to offer? EVEN IF you testify yourself under oath (setting aside your right not to have to testify) it still comes down to he said she said. You say you were, and the father / brother say not.

Back to the Anthonys - What is considered "evidence" ?

 

[love.child]

I used to want to know who the father is. Now I want to know why no one asked who the father was. Because they didn't want to confirm what they suspected? That would be motive for certain people besides KC to not want the body to be found, at least not until it decomposed. In, maybe, an un-informed idea that there would be no DNA left. I think there is no question that everyone loved Caylee. That maybe why no one could incinerate her body which would have destroyed all DNA evidence.
This could also explain why someone who already knows that Caylee had died would say, convincingly, "Where is Caylee!!!" Meaning: where is Caylee's body (I am worried her body will be found and DNA tests will show who the real father is.)
Especially since JG was proven to not be the father. That would make you pretty nervous if you had your own suspicions of who the father is. Even if you are wrong.

 

[MrsThreadgoode]

Who is the driver?

I've been reading on various threads that the driver is one of the "bodyguards" who used to escort Cheney et al to and from the courthouse every day. Haven't read his name anywhere, though.

 

[crucibelle]

That is your opinion. I am not so sure. I think that some sexual activity was taking place within that household at some point, other than between George and Cindy. JMO

I do, too. Especially given Casey's reaction in court when the molestation was mentioned by Baez. That's one of the first times I've seen actual tears from her.

 

[amysmom]

Sorry! but I def do NOT believe a word of the "molestation" claims told in court..FCA & the DT knew they had to come up with something to explain her vile '31 day' behavior (little did they know this jury decided that was meaningless=ludicrous) & this was it..My guess is someone on the DT knew there was a connection to a certain 'situation' they could use to convince (or at least make it a possibility) that this really did take place..They also had the depos very early on from JG & TL stating she had told them some things about Lee (pretty much what was said in OS) but I've always chalked that up to FCA looking for sympathy/attention from them..But never a word about GA! That was only told to Robyn & was something she claims to have "vaguely recalled" while in jail..She also made sure to WRITE it down in a letter..It really did ALL fall perfectly into place for them=let's use the SEX ABUSE claim!

Btw! There was accusations of "ORAL SEX" & something about Lee "attempting to follow in his father's footsteps but he never did" during JB's OS but not a word about "SEXUAL INTERCOURSE"..How come? Cos they knew they couldn't go that far but hoped the jury would *advertiser censored*-ume it..They also had the DNA testing done on Lee to taint their minds all cos NS (FBI) had a hunch there was something "sexual" going on in the A home..Where did he come up with that? Certainly not from anything any of the A's would've told him..The only logical explanation would be from those depos I talked about above.

Re: the paternity..I'm sure CA was thrilled she didn't have to SHARE Caylee with her father..It was actually a blessing not knowing WHO he was..That way there would never be any custody or visitation issues to deal with..Caylee would always remain ALL hers..This is why it didn't matter to her there was no child support $$$..I'm not sure how Lee or GA felt about that but I honestly don't think either one EVER thought it was possible they fathered Caylee..Unless it was an 'immaculate conception'. :crazy:

 

[amysmom]

I do, too. Especially given Casey's reaction in court when the molestation was mentioned by Baez. That's one of the first times I've seen actual tears from her.

It did look genuine to me too but I got the opposite reaction..She was hysterical cos she knew she was throwing her father but more then him Lee under the bus in the WORST possible way..Even tho it's been proven to me she doesn't really care about anyone but herself I still had to go there especially after I saw her reaction to Lee's crying on the stand.