I agree, Cindy should have been prosecuted. Exactly, how many lies did she tell on the stand?
re: the bolded,
Now I'm certainly not sticking up for CA, but how do we know this? She may very well be under psychiatric care, many people see a therapist along with a psychiatrist for decades, and with good reason. Some things take a long time to work through.
Unless there is inside information on this? For all I'm angry with CA for, I would never judge or pretend to know her mental condition at any time during this whole debacle, including through today. And who knows, she may actually be trying to get help? wishful thinking maybe, but I really hope she is seeing a psychiatrist and a therapist and is seeking professional help. Not holding my breath, but ........
Whether or not she can work, if she is on disability, would be up to her doctors, and if she is on disability for mental health reasons, you do have to have that diagnosis from a Psychiatrist or Medical Doctor, not just a therapist. And you have to be current in your treatment to stay on the disability.
Now, I'm the first one to be harsh on CA for many of her actions, what she knew, when she knew it, etc., but I can only speculate on why she did what she did, but I couldn't begin to say for a fact what her real mental condition is or was at any time.
IMO, MOO, etc.
We can grouse all we want but it was Lawson Lamar, the Florida DA, who made that decision not to charge her with perjury - she could argue distress at losing her GD and fear her DD would get the death penalty blah blah blah.
I sure wish we could get confirmation the Ant's actually received the sum we talked about. Lippman managed to stash it away very well if they really did get that amount. I want to know where it is or what they have done with it. :maddening:
This will all hopefully come out in the ZG trial in January.lease:
JMO
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree and the way I see CA is a person who doesn't think she needs help, just like her lovely Daughter. :banghead: I would be shocked if CA were getting therapy or seeing a shrink.
But what really burns my behind is the fact they just received $600,000.00 from dear Dr Phil, but she can still collect disability??? Isn't there a law against that?
I must disagree that, IMO, Cindy's lies were not small, were many and had a huge impact on this shallow, lazy jury. IMO, the few credits given in this post for Cindy's actions is that they were all too little and too late! Not only do I find many of her actions suspicious but I question her motives as well.
Dunno. At that point we had lost count. She had been lying to LE for three years already....
JMO
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree and the way I see CA is a person who doesn't think she needs help, just like her lovely Daughter. :banghead: I would be shocked if CA were getting therapy or seeing a shrink.
But what really burns my behind is the fact they just received $600,000.00 from dear Dr Phil, but she can still collect disability??? Isn't there a law against that?
Ok what lies did Cindy tell that were so hugh that the jury found Casey innocent? I disagree that the jury was shallow and lazy. They had no proof of what caused Caylees death, they had no evidence that Casey was at the scene. What actions did Cindy do that were suspicious?
Ok what lies did Cindy tell that were so hugh that the jury found Casey innocent? I disagree that the jury was shallow and lazy. They had no proof of what caused Caylees death, they had no evidence that Casey was at the scene. What actions did Cindy do that were suspicious?
First of all, Casey was not found "innocent." She was acquitted as being found not guilty. There's a big difference!
Cynthia Anthony swore before God and the court that she was the personal who searched those websites for chloroform. She did not. It was physically impossible for her to be at home using that computer as verified by her timecards, coworkers and computer activity at work. This is a lie, no possible way around it. And it's certainly a big one.
Her blatant lie opened the door for inattentive jurors to shift responsibility away from Casey.
The jury asked questions about their own comfort issues but never had any requests for clarification of complicated court issues or reviewed any of the extensive evidence that was at their disposal.
No evidence that Casey was at the scene? Not sure which scene you're referring to ~ the defense's fabricated pool drowning scene or the prosecution's discovery that Casey was the last person to be seen with Caylee. It doesn't really matter because in either case Casey, as Caylee's mother, was the primary caregiver for Caylee and responsible for her well being.
I thought it was wantonly suspicious when Cindy admitted that she purposefully gave LE the wrong hairbrush and that, had she thought about it, she should have given them the dogs' toothbrushes, too, instead of Caylee's.
BBM - sure they did. Caylee's dead body.
Unfortunately you need more than just a dead body. You need evidence putting Casey at the scene where Caylee was found, and there was none.
No dna or fingerprints on the duct tape.No toxic chemicals in her hair. She won her case but is living a very lonely a sheltered life. She will live the rest of her life in fear and will never have a moments peace. So even though she was found not guilty she is still in a so to speak jail.
Unfortunately you need more than just a dead body. You need evidence putting Casey at the scene where Caylee was found, and there was none.
No dna or fingerprints on the duct tape.No toxic chemicals in her hair. She won her case but is living a very lonely a sheltered life. She will live the rest of her life in fear and will never have a moments peace. So even though she was found not guilty she is still in a so to speak jail.
So long as she reports it, it is not against the law. There are thousands of rich people getting Social Security do you think they should not get their benefits that they paid into the system?