I hear you and can see you point to an extent. But if I had to answer who's exam was more thorough, I would still say Dr. G because at least she ran tests. Dr. S did not run any tests, even on things that he found?? How is that thourough? I find that very faulty and careless. Yes, he sawed the skull, but just because you crack a few extra bones, that does not mean you are more thorough.
Not to mention he could not even remember Caylees name or what circumstances her body was found in. That is part of his job and part of the report he would have put together on Caylee's autopsy, which he admitted today. Dr. G knew the exact amount of days Caylee had been missing and how her remains were found, what they were wrapped in,etc. That told me that she took this exam very seriously, where in my opinion Dr. S made it seem like a joke. Just another huge profile case that he wanted to be a part of. MOO