Maybe someone can answer this for me. WHY was Dr. S allowed to come in and cut the skull in the first place? Don't you have to have some kind of permission from the jurisdiction to do so? Wouldn't Dr. G (as the Dr. who performed the autopsy) have to be present while Dr. S (from another jurisdiction) is degrading the skeletal structure further?
And to assume that he found some type of dust, why didn't he tell someone to test it (in Florda)? Where is the dust. What's become of it?
One more question I didn't hear asked/answered at trial - who was with him when he performed the autopsy? Is there really any evidence of this dust/sediment?
Thanks so much if anyone knows.
Mel
And to assume that he found some type of dust, why didn't he tell someone to test it (in Florda)? Where is the dust. What's become of it?
One more question I didn't hear asked/answered at trial - who was with him when he performed the autopsy? Is there really any evidence of this dust/sediment?
Thanks so much if anyone knows.
Mel