OneLostGrl
I'm going against the grain- I'm going sane
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
- Messages
- 14,316
- Reaction score
- 29
I think Lee is "chameleon-like", just like his sister! He changes himself to fit the person/situation.
ITA.. as do the rest of them.
I think Lee is "chameleon-like", just like his sister! He changes himself to fit the person/situation.
I think Lee is "chameleon-like", just like his sister! He changes himself to fit the person/situation.
I do not think that LA knows what to do with this situation after all it is not simple for the professionals either.I think Lee is "chameleon-like", just like his sister! He changes himself to fit the person/situation.
LA then portrays himself loyal to KC but in the sting video with TL he berates KC.
.
Lee is also a nutcase. I'm thinking charges against the whole family are coming down the pike. Obstruction of Justice if nothing else.
CMA. Casey Marie Anthony..... no one else. He didn't care about anyone, including Caylee, except his little sister. He certainly doesn't care about Justice for his own niece.
I think Lee A. is probably a completely innocent, grief-stricken young man who is grieving the loss of his little niece and the heart-breaking knowledge that she was cruelly murdered by someone and that little to nothing is known about where, how, or by whom she was murdered (not ruling out Casey's involvement in something of course, the family have repeatedly said they don't know if she could have been involved in some kind of criminal activity, though they firmly believe she would never physically harm or abuse Caylee.) Lee has been vilified, maligned, and defamed to a shocking degree, as has the whole Anthony family. I was amazed at the good faith that Lee extended to people like TL and others, treating them with the assumption that they were friends who were equally concerned about Caylee's welfare rather than suspects, and the callous treatment returned to him by those same people. I do not believe that Lee was involved in any crime against Caylee or in a cover up of a crime against Caylee, nor do I think that he or Cindy conspired with each other or Casey or anyone else to deceive police. My two cents anyway.
It is my view that the entire family is dysfunctional. (NO LINK).Could you provide a link to any facts to support these claims? Thanks
(a) that Lee A suffers from any kind of mental illness or that Cindy A does?*
(b) that anyone in the Anthony family is about to be charged with obstruction of justice or that they obstructed justice.
(c) that Lee didn't care about Caylee.
(d) that Lee doesn't want justice to be done for Caylee and the perpetrator of her murder convicted?
*As far as dysfunction or disorder among the family members (responding generally here to several posts Dunlurken, not your post) the only disorder I've seen with any possible substantiation might be GA's supposed online gambling addiction at one time, (I don't know if it's a fact, seems like it's been mentioned by a few family members and maybe mentioned by GA? I'm not absolutely sure on that. Maybe even that isn't true, I'm not sure.) I've never seen any facts to support the rest of the popular, very developed and intricate theories regarding CA's controlling narcissism and the dysfunction in this family. (I won't get into the possible ego-gratification derived by some members of the public in their speculation on this topic. It's been almost gleeful, like some kind of free-for-all, basically. Again, I don't mean you have done that Dunlurken, just speaking generally.)
Since this is a discussion website about the crime and entire case, I think questions will come up regarding any and all people in the case and that's normal, but it's one thing for someone to carefully raise a theory about someone in the case, without stating the theory as a fact, it's another for the speculation to be stated as if it is fact, and to be repeated over and over as fact. MOO
I think Lee A. is probably a completely innocent, grief-stricken young man who is grieving the loss of his little niece and the heart-breaking knowledge that she was cruelly murdered by someone and that little to nothing is known about where, how, or by whom she was murdered (not ruling out Casey's involvement in something of course, the family have repeatedly said they don't know if she could have been involved in some kind of criminal activity, though they firmly believe she would never physically harm or abuse Caylee.) Lee has been vilified, maligned, and defamed to a shocking degree, as has the whole Anthony family. I was amazed at the good faith that Lee extended to people like TL and others, treating them with the assumption that they were friends who were equally concerned about Caylee's welfare rather than suspects, and the callous treatment returned to him by those same people. I do not believe that Lee was involved in any crime against Caylee or in a cover up of a crime against Caylee, nor do I think that he or Cindy conspired with each other or Casey or anyone else to deceive police. My two cents anyway.
Could you provide a link to any facts to support these claims? Thanks
(a) that Lee A suffers from any kind of mental illness or that Cindy A does?*
(b) that anyone in the Anthony family is about to be charged with obstruction of justice or that they obstructed justice.
(c) that Lee didn't care about Caylee.
(d) that Lee doesn't want justice to be done for Caylee and the perpetrator of her murder convicted?
*As far as dysfunction or disorder among the family members (responding generally here to several posts Dunlurken, not your post) the only disorder I've seen with any possible substantiation might be GA's supposed online gambling addiction at one time, (I don't know if it's a fact, seems like it's been mentioned by a few family members and maybe mentioned by GA? I'm not absolutely sure on that. Maybe even that isn't true, I'm not sure.) I've never seen any facts to support the rest of the popular, very developed and intricate theories regarding CA's controlling narcissism and the dysfunction in this family. (I won't get into the possible ego-gratification derived by some members of the public in their speculation on this topic. It's been almost gleeful, like some kind of free-for-all, basically. Again, I don't mean you have done that Dunlurken, just speaking generally.)
Since this is a discussion website about the crime and entire case, I think questions will come up regarding any and all people in the case and that's normal, but it's one thing for someone to carefully raise a theory about someone in the case, without stating the theory as a fact, it's another for the speculation to be stated as if it is fact, and to be repeated over and over as fact. MOO
I agree that Lee was not involved in any crime against Caylee, and probably not involved in any cover up.
However, you say the A's firmly believe KC would never harm or abuse Caylee. This is false... the A's say that publicly, but they don't believe it. Go all the way back to the initial police report, when they first responded to the A's house. GA met the officers outside and expressed worry that KC wasn't telling them everything. CA's 911 call. CA's initial conversation with KC in jail. Everything that's happened since then. They know KC is responsible, they're just not admitting it because they don't want to see their daughter convicted of murder.
I agree that Lee was not involved in any crime against Caylee, and probably not involved in any cover up.
However, you say the A's firmly believe KC would never harm or abuse Caylee. This is false... the A's say that publicly, but they don't believe it. Go all the way back to the initial police report, when they first responded to the A's house. GA met the officers outside and expressed worry that KC wasn't telling them everything. CA's 911 call. CA's initial conversation with KC in jail. Everything that's happened since then. They know KC is responsible, they're just not admitting it because they don't want to see their daughter convicted of murder.
Also, Cindy's July 3rd MySpace message clearly spells out all of Cindy's concerns about Casey's behavior and her worries about Caylee, and begins with "My Caylee is Missing." Cindy's voice mail message to John Allen on July 23 is very telling. Cindy states that Casey "had to have had help" alluding to someone helping Casey in the disposal of Caylee.
Just because it's likely that the A's may now have a private understanding/acceptance that KC is involved in some way with Caylee's death, how does that mean that they cannot still firmly believe that she would never have deliberately harmed or abused Caylee?
Is it really so unreasonable that someone's parents, having raised her from a child to a woman, and knowing her better than anyone else, would believe that she is not capable of deliberate harm or abuse towards her own baby? They clearly know that their daughter lies and steals and have admitted as much - even though they like to minimise/gloss over her misdemeanors in public. But that doesn't mean that they must also know that she is capable of cruelty or murder. We don't know yet how or why Caylee died, or whether it was murder or not, so how can we say that their professed belief is false?
I agree that Lee was not involved in any crime against Caylee, and probably not involved in any cover up.
However, you say the A's firmly believe KC would never harm or abuse Caylee. This is false... the A's say that publicly, but they don't believe it. Go all the way back to the initial police report, when they first responded to the A's house. GA met the officers outside and expressed worry that KC wasn't telling them everything. CA's 911 call. CA's initial conversation with KC in jail. Everything that's happened since then. They know KC is responsible, they're just not admitting it because they don't want to see their daughter convicted of murder.