babycat
whiskey in a teacup
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
- Messages
- 1,642
- Reaction score
- 5
That's the problem - she never provided any - which I think is a big hole in the fake abduction she created...
point taken
:blowkiss:
That's the problem - she never provided any - which I think is a big hole in the fake abduction she created...
Did you consider the possibility that she might have been afraid to tell her mother that and so, instead, told her she had been missing for 31 days?
Right -- however, if she then lost the phone she had used to make the call (one or many) to the hypothetical nanny, she would no longer have the number and probably didn't have it memorized.
I'm flat out making guesses about all of this, and of course it doesn't answer all the issues that exist with this case.
Evidently you need to read my post again.
Nowhere did I insinuate or type that I'd do anything like what you posted.
I never covered for my former friend once.
In fact, I am pretty sure I said I called DFACS on her. Glean whatever you want from my post, but don't put words in my mouth and make assumptions when you know nothing about me.
Seriously, how could ever get that I'd do that?
You know that I'm a Caylee is alive hoper and you just took what you wanted and ran with it.
Thats correct - normally a family member kidnaps the child
With the utmost respect, Evan's Mom, it appeared very clear to me that the poster was trying to rule out the possibility you posted of taking a child from a friend because of neglect/abuse, etc., by saying that someone doing so to save the child, would not also do the list of things angelmom posted. And, in the case at hand, a person taking Caylee from their friend casey out of concern would also have had to allow casey to be charged with murder, would not have a social security number, would not have a usable phone number, no one would know that person, etc. In fact, it appears angelmom was saying that you would NOT do the things she listed and you would not fit the profile of a friend who took Caylee because you are rational and no rational person would so such things. She was saying you would obviosuly NOT do such things because it does not make sense, in my opinion. I do not believe she was attacking you in any way, shape or form.
The number shows up on the bill. LE has all her cell phone records and the theory that she called any nanny was blown outta the water.
Wait a minute, though -- last I knew, KC had been saying she had another phone, a Blackjack, that she had lost. And my recall is that she said this was the phone that had the nanny's number in it.
I realize that nothing relating to the nanny in any way, shape or form has shown up on the cellphone records that LE does have, but my understanding was that they do NOT have the cellphone records from this other Blackjack phone.
Unless I've missed something and the Blackjack has been proven to not exist, it is the Blackjack that I refer to regarding phone calls to/from the nanny as well as phone calls related to anything else that Casey was doing that she was not being straight about to other people.
Wait a minute, though -- last I knew, KC had been saying she had another phone, a Blackjack, that she had lost. And my recall is that she said this was the phone that had the nanny's number in it.
I realize that nothing relating to the nanny in any way, shape or form has shown up on the cellphone records that LE does have, but my understanding was that they do NOT have the cellphone records from this other Blackjack phone.
Unless I've missed something and the Blackjack has been proven to not exist, it is the Blackjack that I refer to regarding phone calls to/from the nanny as well as phone calls related to anything else that Casey was doing that she was not being straight about to other people.
I love my 3-year-old granddaughter more than life, but if someone picked kidnapped her, they'd leave her off at the corner. lol. Kids that age can be very trying. And exhausting. Like Zenaida G said "I have two kids at home still, I don't need any more."
But seriously, I want to believe that most women do have a motherly and protective nature around kids. If I saw a child being abused or neglected, I would turn it in or personally interfer if needed. But I wouldn't kidnap the kid. But maybe, to separate it from a bad situation.
The whole Zenaida story should just be put to rest. Total fabrication.
She honestly thought that if she told her mother the nanny took Caylee for herself because she wanted her and that she KC had no idea where they were, but KNEW SHE WAS SAFE. That Cindy would take that at her word and continue to let KC look for them and eventually her mother would give up and let it be.
Cindy instead called the police.
Without a body, who could prove that she wasn't taken by someone who was more diabolical than Casey--someone such as a child pornographer? This can be a possible defense, right?
The ONLY thing that made me think that maybe just maybe she had been kidnapped at first was the fact that her favorite doll was still in the back of the car, my grand daughters would never leave a beloved doll in the car like that.
Casey just didn't think to bury that doll with Caylee. The fact that there is DNA that proves Caylee is dead in the trunk tells me this was NO kidnapping.
People steal kids EVERYDAY, it's a fact and a reality. I'm NOT saying this happened here but it does happen and for various reasons. Some of the women who abduct are often unable to have children of their own and seek to satisfy their unmet psychological need by abducting a child rather than by adopting. There's also child trafficking etc. It's all quite unsettling but it goes on every single day.
And, now it's worse, because of the body fluids on the pizza bag.
There's proof that whomever had the car on the 19th bought a large pepperoni pizza at Dominos, and threw the pizza into the trunk with the dead baby.