But if Patsy had encountered something she had never seen before, something that cut her to her core like John and JonBenet engaged in a sexual act, do you think she would have held back?
No way would she have held back.
But if Patsy had encountered something she had never seen before, something that cut her to her core like John and JonBenet engaged in a sexual act, do you think she would have held back?
btw.
on this picture S.B.T.C. has last dot:
It is printed on C. I am not sure why it is much less visible on scans of the RN.
That is not a photo of the Ramsey RN. In fact, it looks like one of Rosco Clark's forgeries.btw.
on this picture S.B.T.C. has last dot:
It is printed on C. I am not sure why it is much less visible on scans of the RN.
I've been a WS member for years and I honestly cannot believe the JBR case STILL gets this much attention. There are so many other compelling cases of missing persons and cold case murders that we could all be investing more time in. It's nuts to me that this one case drives people to the most ludacris conspiracy theories. We will probably never know what happened, EVER. I just don't see anything "new" or any new revelations happening with this case. JMO.
What do you see as being "multiple strangle marks?"Thats why there are multiple strangle marks. Found out she was alive, took off noose but too late. Strangled again to cover up the cover up.
I've been a WS member for years and I honestly cannot believe the JBR case STILL gets this much attention. There are so many other compelling cases of missing persons and cold case murders that we could all be investing more time in. It's nuts to me that this one case drives people to the most ludacris conspiracy theories. We will probably never know what happened, EVER. I just don't see anything "new" or any new revelations happening with this case. JMO.
I'm glad you started this thread. I've in no way followed the case as closely as others here, but I've always thought JR to be the most likely perp. Statistically, he's certainly the most likely. His finding her body and moving it screams guilt to me. PR wouldn't be the first woman to choose her man over her daughter. I think Burke was messed up, but I don't think he is a likely killer, just a child who grew up in a sexually abusive home. And I can't see JR and PR not calling 911 in that scenario (BDI)... I've lost a child, and I can't believe they wouldn't have clung to hope, especially since the head injury wasn't readily apparent.I am not anywhere near as knowledgeable about the case as a lot of you so have mercy on me but on the night of the homicide, Patsy would have been weak from having undergone chemo. Also, in the CBS series demo, the child who plays Burke is repeatedly striking a skull replica that remains upright and immobile. The actor wails on the faux skull continuously until he gets the desired result and again, the skull replica doesn't topple.
Wouldn't the only adult male who was present in the home be the one most likely to have had the physical strength to have delivered the head blow?
I'm glad you started this thread. I've in no way followed the case as closely as others here, but I've always thought JR to be the most likely perp. Statistically, he's certainly the most likely. His finding her body and moving it screams guilt to me. PR wouldn't be the first woman to choose her man over her daughter. I think Burke was messed up, but I don't think he is a likely killer, just a child who grew up in a sexually abusive home. And I can't see JR and PR not calling 911 in that scenario (BDI)... I've lost a child, and I can't believe they wouldn't have clung to hope, especially since the head injury wasn't readily apparent.
Basically, i think this is no different than the thousands of other cases on WS, with the twists of money and the hypersexualization of a little girl via the pagents.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
That is not a photo of the Ramsey RN. In fact, it looks like one of Rosco Clark's forgeries.
Possible, but it would be against every parental instinct. A dead child is inconceivable to a parent. The denial and cognitive dissonance and fundamental urge to get help for an injured child... There is no logic or rational thought. You call 911 in a split instant. There is no, "hey, wait, let's think this through." You aren't capable in that moment, the world closes in and you don't see or hear anything but the child. In my case, when my son died, I never heard any sirens, and there were at least 5 emergency vehicles. There were things I didn't see, that I only know of because of what first responders told me. You aren't thinking about how or why, the only thought in your head is saving that child. My other children didn't even enter my mind until responders asked about them.What is the one reason why they wouldnt call 911 if BDI?
A: Its the motive for the entire cover-up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I just can't see a normal, bonded, loving parent taking the time to think through the possibility and ramifications of another child being responsible. Even if it did occur to them, they still would do everything to save their daughter.
I've been a WS member for years and I honestly cannot believe the JBR case STILL gets this much attention. There are so many other compelling cases of missing persons and cold case murders that we could all be investing more time in. It's nuts to me that this one case drives people to the most ludacris conspiracy theories. We will probably never know what happened, EVER. I just don't see anything "new" or any new revelations happening with this case. JMO.
I've been a WS member for years and I honestly cannot believe the JBR case STILL gets this much attention. There are so many other compelling cases of missing persons and cold case murders that we could all be investing more time in. It's nuts to me that this one case drives people to the most ludacris conspiracy theories. We will probably never know what happened, EVER. I just don't see anything "new" or any new revelations happening with this case. JMO.
If you have ever watched 'Child Murderers', you know that children are indeed capable of murder.
From the U.S. Department of Justice: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/193411.pdf (page 3) in 1997, there were less than ten homicides by children 10 and under.