oceanblueeyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 26,446
- Reaction score
- 43,711
I'm considering the option that the gun used was the father's own gun (not that he killed himself but that the perp took it and used it). My reason is that LE has said no gun has been found in the house and I think it's likely the father owned a gun. In this scenario, the violence wasn't planned. I think it's possible the father came home from work and found the perp in his house.
I'm also considering that the perp brought a gun with him, and with enough bullets to do whatever he had planned to do. Honestly, I think this scenario is more likely, but I'm keeping both ideas on the table for now.
jmopinion at the moment, subject to change
I think what LE meant there was no weapon found inside of the home that would match the gunshot wounds of both victims.
LE is very good at looking at the gunshot wounds and knowing the possible caliber of guns that would have made those particular entrance wounds.
Plus the ME would come to the scene and tell them the type of caliber to be looking for.
They know the caliber and imo it was not one owned by her dad. They will know if they find one tossed it belongs to the killer. Imo
I highly doubt he tossed it though. He thinks he may need it in the future.
Last edited: