I can agree with you that George took the right stance in that instance, but I don't agree that based on this single act, he is a "man of honor." In fact, given everything else I have read /seen/ heard regarding GZ I feel he is just the opposite. '
Please forgive my going off subject here, and any repetition if you happened to read my previous comments regarding whether GZ is a "good man." But here's how I look at it. A man of honor would never put his hands on any woman. A man of honor would never pick a female up and throw her across a room. A man of honor, would never strike a woman once, let alone repeatedly
>> I don't believe he did this. IMHO >>
If a woman hit him first, a man of honor, armed with knowledge that he is heavier and stronger (GZ weighed 200 pounds at that time), would refuse to engage and walk away.
>>IMHO, he probably did.<<
A man of honor would not call his ex-fiance a "ho" no matter how things ended, and he would never do this on a public forum. A man of honor would not physically resist arrest, then brag about getting away with it. A man of honor would not commit crimes then allow buddies to "get pinched" for them, spending a year in prison for what he did.
<< GZ abandoned that page long ago because it was hacked. I do not believe he wrote that $hit on that MySpace page. GZ is extremely smart, and well-spoken, and his photos do not depict him as a wannabe. IMO that page was updated by whoever hacked it in the first place, and suddenly brought to light to make him look bad. How else would someone have found it, listed as JOE G..or onlytobekingagain?? ?? >>
A man of honor does not bully co-workers.
<< Trying to get co-workers to do their jobs right can be considered bullying to the folks who wanna get a paycheck just for showing up and standing around. JMO>>
A man of honor, after calling 911 would do as dispatched asked, waiting for the proper authorities to arrive.
<<They did NOT ask him to wait. He was told that he didn't have to follow him, but then they told him to "let them know if he does anything else." That sounds to me like it was not a direct order not to follow.">> JMO
A man of honor after shooting an unarmed teen would feel true remorse, he would not act non-chalant,
>> But a man in SHOCK would also be disoriented. Everything would be SURREAL to him, and his responses would be scattered, flat, and emotionless.>> IMHO.
he would not coldly go into CYA immediately, and assume it would just "blow over." A man of honor takes responsibility for his mistakes, as well as errors in judgment, and expects / accepts punishment when he does wrong. A man of honor would not try to blame a victim for his own death. A man of honor wouldn't create a website for donations to him/his defense and post photos of racist/bigoted supporter's actions there. A man of honor does not lie, he would never lie while on the witness stand, nor would he disingenuously address grieving parents there, feigning ignorance of his victim's young age in order to bolster his defense.