bourne
"The truth shall set you free." ~JUSTICE FOR REBEC
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 2,406
- Reaction score
- 15
Good points Betty P, Lash, KZ, waitaminute, etc.! The demurrers were all weak and point towards trivial technicalities of no import, such as the time the Zahau complaint said Dina and Nina were present at the Spreckels mansion; something easily cleared up by the times given as Tues pm to Wed am...
As with all murder cases, theory is based on the evidence provided by LE and the ME, however limited it may be but that is not the fault of the Zahaus, it's the fault of LE and ME for deficiencies in investigation, evidence collection and analyses.
Fortunately, in a WDS, a civil suit, the verdict/outcome of the case is dependent upon the *Preponderance* of evidence (slightly more than 50%), not beyond a reasonable doubt. In the Zahau case, there is significant preponderance of evidence that the *Three Elements of Murder* are present: 1) Motive; 2) Opportunity; and 3) Means for each of the three defendants, Dina, Nina and Adam.
Obviously the strongest motive for murder belongs to Dina who not only had a documented *History* of physical violence as evidenced by 5-6 years worth of police reports wherein she tried to strangle and choke her own husband Jonah, and also there are witnesses who saw Dina stalk, publicly harassed and assaulted Rebecca at a party. There is also evidence by Dina herself wherein she sought investigative reports on Rebecca's "criminal history" but all Dina discovered was one shoplifting charge. In addition, the bitter resentment, anger and wrath, is evident in Dina's continual pursuit of hatred towards Rebecca and the Zahau family since Rebecca came into the picture and through today and onward...This is clearly seen in Dina's own perpetration of media circus wherein she publicly accused Rebecca and Rebecca's teenage sis XZ of "torpedoeing" Max to his braindeath and caused his "homicide".
PLUS Dina hated and despised Rebecca with a vengeance because Dina believed that Rebecca, an "Asian golddigger" "stole" her husband Jonah from her (and in so doing, Dina believed Rebecca caused Dina to lose her $money bag wealth, prestige, status and social network), and the precipitating event which caused Dina to go over the edge to murder is that Rebecca critically injured and caused the braindeath of Dina's one and only son Max (which meant Dina lost her single biological attachment to Jonah after their divorce and could no longer reap the financial and other benefits for child custody).
Opportunity - Dina "vanished" for the entire day of Tuesday from 6am till Wednesday morning 7am from the hospital where her dying son lied in the bed. Plus Dina was physically seen by a family of "eyewitnesses" at the Spreckels mansion around time of 11pm Tuesday Rebecca was killed. Plus earwitnesses physically heard a woman yell out for help around that same time of 11pm Tuesday. Yet Dina continued to "lie" about "sitting vigil by Max's bedside"...A good juror would ask "Why did Dina lie"? And "Where is her ironclad alibi of eyewitnesses at the hospital during the critical time period when Rebecca was sadistically tortured and hung"? Also, even in Dina's own demurrer, her lawyers seem to tacitly agree that Dina was physically present at the Spreckels mansion Tuesday 11pm!!!!!
Means - Dina grew up with Navy dad who taught her and her fraternal twin sister how to sail. This means Dina and Nina were taught how to tie nautical knots. Also Dina's dad owned a moving company so Dina and Nina certainly learned how to bind things together, such as tying rope to bedleg and the noose around Rebecca's neck.
I can go on and on with the plentitude of physical evidence. But any reasonable juror and judge can easily put 2 and 2 together and see that there is more than a "preponderance" of evidence that Dina and Nina murdered Rebecca.
As with all murder cases, theory is based on the evidence provided by LE and the ME, however limited it may be but that is not the fault of the Zahaus, it's the fault of LE and ME for deficiencies in investigation, evidence collection and analyses.
Fortunately, in a WDS, a civil suit, the verdict/outcome of the case is dependent upon the *Preponderance* of evidence (slightly more than 50%), not beyond a reasonable doubt. In the Zahau case, there is significant preponderance of evidence that the *Three Elements of Murder* are present: 1) Motive; 2) Opportunity; and 3) Means for each of the three defendants, Dina, Nina and Adam.
Obviously the strongest motive for murder belongs to Dina who not only had a documented *History* of physical violence as evidenced by 5-6 years worth of police reports wherein she tried to strangle and choke her own husband Jonah, and also there are witnesses who saw Dina stalk, publicly harassed and assaulted Rebecca at a party. There is also evidence by Dina herself wherein she sought investigative reports on Rebecca's "criminal history" but all Dina discovered was one shoplifting charge. In addition, the bitter resentment, anger and wrath, is evident in Dina's continual pursuit of hatred towards Rebecca and the Zahau family since Rebecca came into the picture and through today and onward...This is clearly seen in Dina's own perpetration of media circus wherein she publicly accused Rebecca and Rebecca's teenage sis XZ of "torpedoeing" Max to his braindeath and caused his "homicide".
PLUS Dina hated and despised Rebecca with a vengeance because Dina believed that Rebecca, an "Asian golddigger" "stole" her husband Jonah from her (and in so doing, Dina believed Rebecca caused Dina to lose her $money bag wealth, prestige, status and social network), and the precipitating event which caused Dina to go over the edge to murder is that Rebecca critically injured and caused the braindeath of Dina's one and only son Max (which meant Dina lost her single biological attachment to Jonah after their divorce and could no longer reap the financial and other benefits for child custody).
Opportunity - Dina "vanished" for the entire day of Tuesday from 6am till Wednesday morning 7am from the hospital where her dying son lied in the bed. Plus Dina was physically seen by a family of "eyewitnesses" at the Spreckels mansion around time of 11pm Tuesday Rebecca was killed. Plus earwitnesses physically heard a woman yell out for help around that same time of 11pm Tuesday. Yet Dina continued to "lie" about "sitting vigil by Max's bedside"...A good juror would ask "Why did Dina lie"? And "Where is her ironclad alibi of eyewitnesses at the hospital during the critical time period when Rebecca was sadistically tortured and hung"? Also, even in Dina's own demurrer, her lawyers seem to tacitly agree that Dina was physically present at the Spreckels mansion Tuesday 11pm!!!!!
Means - Dina grew up with Navy dad who taught her and her fraternal twin sister how to sail. This means Dina and Nina were taught how to tie nautical knots. Also Dina's dad owned a moving company so Dina and Nina certainly learned how to bind things together, such as tying rope to bedleg and the noose around Rebecca's neck.
I can go on and on with the plentitude of physical evidence. But any reasonable juror and judge can easily put 2 and 2 together and see that there is more than a "preponderance" of evidence that Dina and Nina murdered Rebecca.
.