Here is the docket information: #7 down the page
http://www1.aoc.state.nc.us/www/dat...13.2008/D._DEBRA_S__SASSER.8B.9_00.TRIALS.txt
Lot to cover in 2 hours. Good luck Judge Sasser.
Thanks Garner NC for the link.Looks to me this was signed 7/30 so not at all sure how the hearing for the 22 of September even got scheduled. Hmmmmm.
I wasn't sure I recalled that the 22nd Sep psych exam date was 'firm'? I was trying to recall where I read it. Regardless, it could have been errant information in a news article from way back when, and it's always been set for the 26th anyway?
The 26th is today LOL :crazy: I was sure I heard the week of the 22nd but it must have changed to the 29th. I had contacted 2 of my "contacts" and both said the same about the 29th and the delay till Oct so I didn't bother to post the second round of info.
Like Garner, I'm just trying to help when I can since I luvs all of yas![]()
Topsail, if one can believe the N & O - the motion was due to be heard on Monday the 22nd:
http://www.newsobserver.com/2864/story/1174638.html
Last month, attorneys for Nancy Cooper's family had asked a judge to demand a psychological evaluation of her husband, but withdrew the request as they negotiated a temporary agreement over custody of the couple's daughters. They are now asking that a judge hear a new request for a psychological evaluation on Sept. 22.
Note the article is dated 12 August, 2008
Thanks RC. You have just confirmed to me that at least this day I am NOT losing my mind!!!! LOL :blowkiss:
Also wanted to tell you that I read up on Rowan - I can't bring myself to keep up with those type cases. I can't recall which thread we were discussing it in but I wanted to tell you that I do agree with your statements regarding the body disposal, etc.
The 26th is today LOL :crazy:
Typo on my part - sorry to add confusion to the already confused situation. Edited my post to read 29th now. [ Either N&O didn't have it exactly right to begin with, or since Aug 12th, it got pushed out 1 week... probably the latter] Anyway TGIF.![]()
Lot to cover in 2 hours. Good luck Judge Sasser.
Did he not do his research to find the best lawyers?
From K&B website: "Hannah Pritchard swore under oath during the custody proceeding that Nancy never took it off under any circumstance."
I'm sure the DA's case is not based on the necklace and those shoes. Considering they didn't seize either of those items until after Brad was in jail, and they indicted before they had that evidence, this may be some 'icing' on the prosecution case. Unless they find 2 left shoes discarded outside somewhere, the shoes may strongly hint at Brad grabbing a non-matching 'pair,' but it won't necessarily be proved. And if they found the 2 left shoes somewhere in the house...well...I don't know what that means exactly since neither was discarded.
I believe this removes the necklace as an issue.