Any other interesting info? Didn't see it.
Glad to hear the husband is being more cooperative. Frankly, his initial behavior is something I would classify as "smart" if he is innocent though I totally understand everyone's frustration.
I live in a small town in Illinois, there is a murder case in the next town over of a kid my husband knew when the kid went missing (kid as in, 16). The LE is the definition of "bumbling". Totally clueless and ruined evidence that would have made the conviction a slam dunk (they cleaned up blood!! Who does that.). This was because they just didn't know better sadly, bad training. We have heard of a number of LE throughout the US that are just so because they have never being exposed to crime other than pulling over cars - I am sorry if this sounds a bit mean but we do need to be a bit realistic. I don't think it is unreasonable to assume that the LE in Lander, WY is small town LE that is years behind the LE I'm used to from Chicago.
What I'm getting at is that it is not unreasonable to think that the husband was being truthful in that LE was accusing him right off the bat. It could have been really ugly and frankly, really scary. I do think his lawyer advised him to keep his mouth shut. We have a number of visitors here so I'll explain a bit, I used to think this behavior was automatic indication of guilt, however being accused of a crime you did not commit is scary as hell. Lie detector tests are not considered reliable and cannot be entered as evidence (if this is incorrect, lawyers please speak up) because they could be unreliable. It would be a shame if the test gave incorrect information and the public opinion was that he was guilty. If he was not, the real killer would be running around but once the public hones in on their "murderer" it's really hard to get an easy cut and dry case. Think of the many high profile cases you have heard of in the past. Some of them fall into this category.
That he is now cooperating is good news. Hopefully he is innocent.