I agree with you 100%.
Me, too.
I agree with you 100%.
Gabby and Brian were adults and they were not married. Roberta Laundrie can block calls from whomever she wants. I consider it the reality of life rather than emotional distress.Gabby and Brian met while they were in high school. The families have known each other for years. Roberta Laundrie blocked calls from Gabby’s family, despite a previously established relationship between their families. This is just one example of inflicting emotional duress. <modsnip: personalizing>
They were engaged, and yeah she also knew that they had had problems in their relationship. She can block them, but that was rude to do so!Gabby and Brian were adults and they were not married. Roberta Laundrie can block calls from whomever she wants. I consider it the reality of life rather than emotional distress.
JMO
Gabby and Brian were adults and they were not married. Roberta Laundrie can block calls from whomever she wants. I consider it the reality of life rather than emotional distress.
JMO
The P's are not complaining about Roberta's capacity to block whomsoever. Roberta's problem, and it's a major, major problem is that she could not control herself enough to absolutely block herself from making any comment whatsoever.Gabby and Brian were adults and they were not married. Roberta Laundrie can block calls from whomever she wants. I consider it the reality of life rather than emotional distress.
JMO
oh, snap!!!Yes absolutely she can but this is not what the lawsuit is about.
If your son told you he accidentally killed your future daughter-in-law you seem to think it is ok to hide that fact from the daughter-in-law's parents and that it is just too darn bad if it causes them emotional distress.
They not only hid this fact - which they actually had a constitutional right to do - but they then took the outrageous step of telling the media they hoped she would be found safe and sound - when they knew she was dead.
Disgusting behavior but not against the law. Thus, we have civil court.
A judge has ruled that this is grounds for the lawsuit to continue. That there is emotional damage is really not in dispute, what the jury will decide is if it reaches the level of a money damage award and how much.
2 Cents
BBM. I've seen no proof that Brian Laundrie told his mother he killed Gabby.Yes absolutely she can but this is not what the lawsuit is about.
If your son told you he accidentally killed your future daughter-in-law you seem to think it is ok to hide that fact from the daughter-in-law's parents and that it is just too darn bad if it causes them emotional distress.
They not only hid this fact - which they actually had a constitutional right to do - but they then took the outrageous step of telling the media they hoped she would be found safe and sound - when they knew she was dead.
Disgusting behavior.
A judge has ruled that this is grounds for the lawsuit to continue. That there is emotional damage is really not in dispute, what the jury will decide is if it reaches the level of a money damage award and how much.
2 Cents
NoHas any legitimate evidence appeared or been disclosed that the murderer’s parents suggested to him that he turn himself in to authorities or give the authorities a statement?
MOO
not in any way , shape, or form. Nothing even remotely close to such a concept, at all. In fact, there is compelling evidence that a lot of effort and time went into avoiding any police involvement whatsoever. And it was mostly successful, as an avoidance tactic. Brian, as far as I am aware was never subjected to a rational enquiry about exactly where Gabby was presently situated by any investigative authority, ever.Has any legitimate evidence appeared or been disclosed that the murderer’s parents suggested to him that he turn himself in to authorities or give the authorities a statement?
MOO
The Laundrie family admits what they knowBBM. I've seen no proof that Brian Laundrie told his mother he killed Gabby.
Please provide a link. Thanks.
JMO
Thankyou for pinpointing exactly what this civil suite is about. Although done from a point of false equivalence re the bank stuff, your inadvertently made point is valid. Hopefully, the P's will be successful in having the law changed, altered, rectified or instigated to precisely cover these sort of chain of events.So Trooper, it appears that you’re supporting the following logic:
Statement:
“There’s no proof he robbed the bank”
Response:
“Well, there’s no proof he didn’t either, so therefore he’s guilty!”
Huh? I’m glad you’re not a judge!
The Laundries might be wrong, immoral, self-serving, unconscionable, outrageous, and even disgusting, but they broke no laws.
Jmo
<modsnip> The attorney is repeating what he was told by Mr. Laundrie. That isn't proof Mr. Laundrie knew Gabby was dead.The Laundrie family admits what they know
Court documents by Melissa R. on Scribd
Melissa Ratliff • DIGITAL CONTENT MANAGER
Affiliations • ABC7
View attachment 466302
During Steven Bertolino’s deposition, he testified that "Christopher Laundrie did advise him on or about August 29, 2021, that he has spoken with Brian Laundrie, that Brian Laundrie was frantic, stated that Gabrielle Petito was ‘gone,’ and further requested his parents obtain a lawyer,” the motion says.
It is proof that the Laundries knew Gabby was gone by August 29th yet they did not tell her parents. That is a pretty big deal.Big deal. The attorney is repeating what he was told by Mr. Laundrie. That isn't proof Mr. Laundrie knew Gabby was dead.
In those legal documents, the Petito family also claims that Brian sent a text message Gabby's mother saying there was no cell phone service in Yosemite Park.
In reality, cell phone service is sporadic in national parks.
JMO
"The complaint further says that on Aug. 30, 2021, Laundrie allegedly sent a text message from Gabby Petito’s phone to her mother stating there was no service in Yosemite Park in an “effort deceive Nichole Schmidt into believing that Gabrielle Petito was still alive,” the filing said."
Last updated: June 19, 2020
Cell Service
AT&T
Yosemite Valley: Voice and 3G (4G HSPA+) data and voice, primarily in eastern Yosemite Valley
Tuolumne Meadows: EDGE data and voice during summer, however this service is not reliable and may not be functioning, especially during early and late summer. If cell service is not available, it's likely traditional telephone service is also not available. The nearest cell and traditional phone service is in Lee Vining, outside the park.
T-Mobile
Yosemite Valley: 4G LTE and voice, primarily in eastern Yosemite Valley
Verizon Wireless
Yosemite Valley: 4G LTE and voice, primarily in eastern Yosemite Valley
Foresta: 4G LTE and voice
Crane Flat: 3G and voice
El Portal, Wawona: 4G LTE data service and voice
Tuolumne Meadows: 1x data service and voice during summer, however this service is not reliable and may not be functioning, especially during early and late summer. If cell service is not available, it's likely traditional telephone service is also not available. The nearest cell and traditional phone service is in Lee Vining, outside the park.
It isn't proof the Laundries knew Gabby was dead or that they knew their son had killed her. In fact, the Petito's attorney sent a letter to Mr. & Mrs. Laundrie two days AFTER Brian disappeared from their home. How callous is that? It took a month to find their son's body. They hired an attorney because their son illegally used Gabby's debit card.It is proof that the Laundries knew Gabby was gone by August 29th yet they did not tell her parents. That is a pretty big deal.
Even if they thought she was gone as in missing as opposed to having died, they owed it to her parents to tell them and at least get a search party going and file a missing person report.
They did zero of that, zero of what normal people would do. Just let her be gone with no help. Let her be lost and maybe injured out there somewhere, who cares?
What did they do? Hired an attorney to protect their guilty son.
Pathetic.
He refused to speak to law enforcement on the advice from his attorney. Brian used Gabby's debit card after she died.Has any legitimate evidence appeared or been disclosed that the murderer’s parents suggested to him that he turn himself in to authorities or give the authorities a statement?
MOO
Actually, the reason the Moab police didn’t arrest Brian Laundrie is because they identified the wrong person as the perpetrator. Moab Police made mistakes due to not being properly trained in domestic violence.Let's not forget that the reason the Moab police didn't arrest Brian is because Gabby admitted she hit him.
They didn't arrest Brian because Gabby admitted to police that she had hit Brian. Police had them separate for the night which is what police do in my state if they don't witness the hitting.Actually, the reason the Moab police didn’t arrest Brian Laundrie is because they identified the wrong person as the perpetrator. Moab Police made mistakes due to not being properly trained in domestic violence.