Bertha96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2021
- Messages
- 595
- Reaction score
- 3,683
Publicly known "evidence sufficient to convict" him of the homicide is just not going to happen. Not at this point, and not until any trial, if there is one.
Folks following this and similar cases should really understand that the legs process is long, and incremental, that trials are tricky (in the sense of adding procedural matters into the mix when it comes to what evidence is admissible or not, and many other things), and until closing arguments, you are just not going to know what all is in the mix from an adjudication perspective.
There is a significant distance between/among evidence sufficient to arrest, to charge, to prosecute, and to close.
Not directed specifically at you, but statements before there is even a person in custody that "I don't see enough for a conviction" just really clutter the discussion.
I doubt the public is privy to what evidence LE has at the moment, especially if it could be used in court to convict. IMO.