SuziQ
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 39,600
- Reaction score
- 52,003
BBM
The 911 caller may have given a factually accurate account to the dispatcher. But we can't know that and the officers certainly couldn't count on that. (I'm not discounting unconscious effects on the officers memories in making my point here.)
But I'm sure LE encounters all kinds of reports from concerned citizens that turn out to be factually incorrect (and sometimes extremely so.) And sometimes "uninvolved" callers without "an agenda" turn out to have one after all. Simply because the 911 caller called in immediately after observing the incident doesn't mean he got it right.
I'm not saying his account was flawed but it could have been. For example, perhaps his beloved sister recently left an abusive relationship with a man. If so, the caller could be primed to see DV as always male-instigated. We know our biases prime what we see and how we interpret ambiguous situations. ("We see things not as they are; we see them as we are.") That's true for any of us although it's hoped proper training will make us more objective observers.
Definitely a tragic situation but given the statements GB and BL made and the physical evidence (admittedly scant) I can't imagine most officers would haul anyone off to jail based on a 911 call.
JMO
https://mobile.twitter.com/sara_ballou/status/1442212502993965059