CharlestonGal
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- 47,451
No.Does anyone think that BL could still be alive somehow? Just a theory given other strange behaviors from the parents and others.
Speculation
MOO
No.Does anyone think that BL could still be alive somehow? Just a theory given other strange behaviors from the parents and others.
Speculation
MOO
I hate to drag personal experience into this, but I have been choked a couple of times. I did not go unconscious in 30 seconds, either time. One time, I thought I WAS actually going to die, and I still never lost consciousness. It all depends on which structures are being affected, and whether the hyoid bone is broken or not. Outside of those experiences, I'm certainly not an expert, so I can't go any farther than to say that I expect strangulation deaths may happen in a number of ways. Someone who is angry enough to strangle someone else may have no real concept of time and may do more damage than they realized in different time frames.
That’s been my thought for awhile. I can’t imagine how the 13th timeline works out.With all due respect to JT, I disagree. Roberta is NOT built like Brian at all. If that's the case, I think LE thought he was there and it was just the parents the entire time, not Brian. I'm starting to believe BL left earlier than Sept. 13th now.
No .. I never entertained the thought that he was alive from the moment he shunted out in the Mustang ..... all the absolute sightings and particularly from some people with a high degree of self imposed validity, who claimed he asked for directions to California,... all wishful thinking.Does anyone think that BL could still be alive somehow? Just a theory given other strange behaviors from the parents and others.
Speculation
MOO
Does anyone think that BL could still be alive somehow? Just a theory given other strange behaviors from the parents and others.
Speculation
MOO
No. I trust the experts who matched the dental remains to BL's dental records.Does anyone think that BL could still be alive somehow? Just a theory given other strange behaviors from the parents and others.
Speculation
MOO
IMO the remains were identified as BL but the question is how did he die. Was it by his own hand? Was it due to animal predation? Was it accidental such as due to injury? Was it the work of a vigilante (either someone not known to him or someone known to him)? Could someone have held him at gun point and made him end his life so as to appear it was by suicide? IF someone killed him at the scene or dumped his remains at the location, it would be nearly impossible to determine and most likely would never be questioned. IMO.
After hearing LE explanation of why they thought BL was in the house after the Mustang returned from CR, I have to wonder if BL actually left in the stang to begin with..JMOHOCould his mother have tried to make herself look like Brian, so LE would think he was back home? Even with just a baseball cap on, it's obvious she's not Brian. Maybe a hoodie pulled up? But not just a baseball cap.
Does anyone think that BL could still be alive somehow? Just a theory given other strange behaviors from the parents and others.
Speculation
MOO
There are so many options that could have had this result. Much like everything else, we may never know.That's what I have been thinking.
After hearing LE explanation of why they thought BL was in the house after the Mustang returned from CR, I have to wonder if BL actually left in the stang to begin with..JMOHO![]()
I was referring specifically to digestion as opposed to speed of emptying in analysis of contentsThe subject of gastric emptying issue came up during the Oscar Pistorius trial. Prof. Saayman, forensic pathologist, performed the autopsy on Reeva and said a person's stomach is normally empty of food six hours after eating. He took pains to qualify this statement by saying that estimating the time of gastric emptying was not an exact science and that he was relying on his years of experience and studying.
Saayman is Head of the Dept of Forensic Medicine at the University of Pretoria and Chief Specialist in the Forensic Pathology Service. He has 30 years of experience as a forensic pathologist and is responsible for the medico-legal investigation of unnatural and unexplained deaths and has performed and supervised approximately 10,000-15,000 such case investigations and post mortem examinations.
There are so many possibilities to BL's COD. An entire can of worms IMO. There's an unlikely possibility that BL attacked one or both of the L's & lost. Then was taken to MP & dumped along w/the wet bag, back pack, etc. Anything is possible. I think it's so important that BL's COD is determined...totally speculation on my part.That's what I have been thinking.
So far SB has been claiming he ‘mentioned in passing’ to the FBI that BL went for a hike and didn’t return. On AB he said he couldn’t remember if it was Monday (13th) night or Tues (14) morning, but since then the FBI had confirmed it was Monday. SB also indicated it was not his responsibility to check on what the two law agencies were sharing. NPPD has claimed no one informed them BL was gone.I don’t understand the point in saying these things by NPPD-it sounds worse than they just missed it. This case seems to be littered with instances of people who should better know when it’s better off to keep your mouth shut but just don’t seem to be able to. IMO.
It's hard to imagine anyone would bother tracking Bri to end his life.. I actually doubt if any self respecting animal would put the time into it..IMO the remains were identified as BL but the question is how did he die. Was it by his own hand? Was it due to animal predation? Was it accidental such as due to injury? Was it the work of a vigilante (either someone not known to him or someone known to him)? Could someone have held him at gun point and made him end his life so as to appear it was by suicide? IF someone killed him at the scene or dumped his remains at the location, it would be nearly impossible to determine and most likely would never be questioned. IMO.
oh I agree. If they said 'screaming' he was screaming. <modsnip>personally, I would only refer to ‘screaming’ as actual screaming.
If it were someone merely being strident and adding on a little emphasis/biting their words off, I’d probably call it ‘barking’.
If it were less serious a topic, like maybe the person was doing it for exaggerated effect or a joke, I’d call it ‘yelling’ or ‘hollering’.
admittedly, I am not everyone else in the world but I wouldn’t be surprised if they all use particular names for personal perceptions of unduly exercised voices.
I think it’s a bad autocorrect. “Laundromat” is Laundrie- for BL. ….camper, that Laundrie and his parents….This sounds like one of those auto translations of an article from China. I run into that laundromat thing often when I see those articles. Moo
eta- or not? I just read the link. Weird
FBI/LE has made no mention of the parents phones. So we don't know.Didn't the parents go to a phone store before they went to search for BL? Did they get more new phones perhaps?
Do we know?
BBMUnlikely they could tell. For one thing, all forms of scavengers go for that area of the body (the gut) because it's easy and contains lots of calories.
The fact that Gabby's boots were found placed near her body, the way a person does when they put their boots outside a tent, combined with Stepdad's view that there was a good tent space (for their sized tent) right there makes me think they got to the site, and managed to put up the tent. Gabby was wearing a sweatshirt, so the air had gotten chilly.
It had to be either August 27 or 28. And those saying that only Brian was seen on cams during that period are correct, AFAIK. August 27 makes the most sense. But whether it was August 27, 28 or 29, it is still a period when Brian is known to be in the area, before he takes off (from that campsite) for Florida.
He had to have seen her on the ground. He had to have noticed she was dead. He did nothing. Which is evidence of guilt, for those who still need it.