Sorry to pull one small thing from your (very interesting and well researched posts) but this stood out to me
By the very nature of missing persons enquiries, I imagine this would be almost impossible to quantify, as it’s not like you can have a control for comparison.
It’s not possible to investigate a missing person without everyone involved knowing their name and race, so any so-called “lack of bias” would presumably be self-reported and therefore not entirely reliable.
BBMWhat they found was that participants were poor at deciding which subjects were at high risk, which is significant to resource allocation because the perception of high risk correlates to the application of resources, but what they did not find was any racial bias in that decision-making.
By the very nature of missing persons enquiries, I imagine this would be almost impossible to quantify, as it’s not like you can have a control for comparison.
It’s not possible to investigate a missing person without everyone involved knowing their name and race, so any so-called “lack of bias” would presumably be self-reported and therefore not entirely reliable.