Zellner Tweets

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

missy1974 said:
posting this here ( because this is the ZELLNER's TWEETS thread lol) and in BD's thread.

attachment.php
Click to expand...

REALLY??? He is free to go home???
 
and it's been deleted LOL

So does she know there will be an announcement and gave her opinion? who knows. Carla sure doesn't seem to be showing a reaction, either way. Not like she knows or it's news to her, so I'm just not sure LOL
 
I see Carla posted this now too...

Carla Chase Yes she did delete but it's out.. it was announced they would have it out by Monday.. Monday is a holiday so tomorrow would be the day.. wouldn't u think?


and

someone else mentioned that there was an article out tonight that said it would be announced no later than Monday, then KZ tweeted. (Monday is a holiday there)
 
KZ has put out a new tweet... sorry, don't feel like getting a screenshot lol

Kathleen Zellner ‏@ZellnerLaw 5m5 minutes ago
The Wisc AG has only one moral, just and righteous decision to make for BD: Let him go --it is over.
#MakingAMurderer

this was after someone tweeted Drizin (BD's lawyer) about her earlier tweet.... guessing there may have been a late night call? LOL
 
missy1974 said:
KZ has put out a new tweet... sorry, don't feel like getting a screenshot lol

Kathleen Zellner ‏@ZellnerLaw 5m5 minutes ago
The Wisc AG has only one moral, just and righteous decision to make for BD: Let him go --it is over.
#MakingAMurderer

this was after someone tweeted Drizin (BD's lawyer) about her earlier tweet.... guessing there may have been a late night call? LOL
Click to expand...
I, personally, think she's a reckless tweeter. She tweets stuff, apparently not getting that her tweets can be, and quite often are, misinterpreted. Then, when the tweet backfires, she ends up having to delete them. You'd think the woman would learn by now but apparently not.
 
hmm so kind of interesting LOL

Steve Drizin (SA's lawyer) just tweeted again...

Steven A Drizin ‏@SDrizin 7m7 minutes ago
Don't know what KZ's talking about; too late to get answers. But words "will announce" not in her 2d tweet. Goodnight.

https://twitter.com/SDrizin here is a link to his twitter.

So KZ tweets and delete's .... people were tweeting SD about her tweet, a little bit later, KZ puts out a new tweet... a little bit later SD tweets the above pointing out "will announce" is missing now LOL

Just all seems weird to me LOL
 
shadowraiths said:
I, personally, think she's a reckless tweeter. She tweets stuff, apparently not getting that her tweets can be, and quite often are, misinterpreted. Then, when the tweet backfires, she ends up having to delete them. You'd think the woman would learn by now but apparently not.
Click to expand...

I have to agree about this tweet. BD isn't her client, even if she knows something, she should keep it to herself.

If it just so happens that something is announce and it confirms her tweet within the next few days.... then I'm thinking there was a plan LOL
 
Steven Avery attorney: Announcement Friday regarding Dassey case

On Thursday evening, Kathleen Zellner tweeted a picture of a man holding up a sign reading, “It is over.” The tweet was deleted about 20 minutes later, but it was shared dozens of times.

[...]

Schimel spoke with WISN in Milwaukee on Thursday, saying, “I’m not prepared to make any announcements on that yet. We have made some decisions, but I’m not prepared to announce that right now.”​

WBay
 
It's risky to tweet to tantalize, or be cutting edge... You have to go out on a limb. It doesn't always work out ... but if you don't just go for it, you lose that edge. *shrug*

Just like a good improv comidian can't land every punchline, but they have to push the limits.
 
Not sure why Zellner felt the need to announce this for BD, who is not her client, and the information has not been confirmed. BD has an attorney & any public announcements about BD's case should come from the people directly involved in BD's case (IMO).
 
Madeleine74 said:
Not sure why Zellner felt the need to announce this for BD, who is not her client, and the information has not been confirmed. BD has an attorney & any public announcements about BD's case should come from the people directly involved in BD's case (IMO).
Click to expand...
She is great proof that we haven't evolved enough to handle social media. I'm all for either shutting down Facebook and Twitter until we are capable of handling it OR enacting a law which prohibits the news media from: deciding that some dummy in Bismarck's tweet or FB post is news; reporting some dumb celebrities tweet about a tragedy they weren't involved in as news; and doing more than one human interest story per week. All violations will be punishable by immediate execution of that media organization's entire staff. (I'm against the death penalty except for this)

Then maybe we'll see actual news reported for the first time in years.

Sorry for the rant...
 
^^ Or... we could just choose not to believe everything we read.

Also, perhaps we have evolved enough to choose to avoid using social media, if said media upsets us...
 
Safeguard said:
^^ Or... we could just choose not to believe everything we read.

Also, perhaps we have evolved enough to choose to avoid using social media, if said media upsets us...
Click to expand...
I could care less about social media until it is covered as news in place of legitimate, meaningful things that actually impact people's lives.

Let's ignore the fact that the US military has killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians since 2002, the illegal US actions around the world, inequality in education, poverty and injustice because we have to cover the latest actress or actor who is upset because people were mean to them on the internet which, of course, demands wall to wall coverage.
 
Kathleen Zellner ‏@ZellnerLaw 15m15 minutes ago
Crucial witnesses coming forward now-as they always do when new scientific testing sought. Science not spin will rule.
#MakingAMurderer
 
thanks angelainwi :) I grabbed a snip of it!

zellner tweet sept 3.PNG

Interesting that it's plural witnessES ;-)
 
angelainwi said:
Kathleen Zellner ‏@ZellnerLaw 15m15 minutes ago
Crucial witnesses coming forward now-as they always do when new scientific testing sought. Science not spin will rule.
#MakingAMurderer
Click to expand...
Witnesses are not science.
If science will rule then the witnesses are unimportant because they're spin.
She is contradicting herself.
Does she drink?
 
I think she is basically saying, oh now that people see what she wants to test.... they are coming forward... pooing in their pants a bit maybe? Not wanting to be implicating in something they had nothing to do with?

Witnesses are not science, but if those witnesses are worried about what the science might say, they are better off coming forward now. I think it's pretty clear, and it's what she said last week as well. Science will always rule speculation.

I like that it's plural :)
 
HastingsChi said:
Witnesses are not science.
If science will rule then the witnesses are unimportant because they're spin.
She is contradicting herself.
Does she drink?
Click to expand...

She's not saying the witnesses are science.

She is saying that witnesses are coming forward because of the science.

In other words, those involved in the corruption and lies are shaking in their boots and coming forward to tell their side of the story while they still can.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 80 more.
Total: 309 (members: 81, guests: 228)

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
228
Total visitors
309
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,561
Messages
18,241,320
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top