Recent content by Afton

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25608543/ SNIP The previous 1997 DNA “swab” testing of the child’s panties found DNA in two separate areas. DNA was found mixed with fluid from the little girl. The 1997, DNA contained enough information or DNA markers to be entered into the federal DNA database...

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0608/25/lkl.01.html KING: Dr. Kobilinsky, it's known that Dr. Henry Lee, another frequent guest on this show, found DNA on newly -- the newly purchased girl's underwear, tested right after the packaging. Do you think that fact may leave a misleading...

In the A&E documentary, some do not go to the extreme of that kind of surgery--Maybe face surgery or breast enlargement ...He may have felt that after the Tracey emails, that someone was hot on his trail, and then again he was losing job after job, so maybe he figured it was a way to present...

he is changing his gender to hide from the authorities after skipping out on the CA charge...Then he puts on a wig and does a name change.

Hi Doc--I was debating the reason the Grand Jury was called...Was it only called to be investigative jury, or called as an investigative jury that could indict. I wanted to know for myself, so I looked it up and found the following quotes. We also debated whether or not the grand jury...

Yes we sure do, don't we MVGF...In fact we made up ones just to see if the other would know what it meant....:)

Since the Globe had the Ramseys as their main suspects, I hardly think they would then reverse themselves...And I also think that Schiller had checked his sources and did not rely on the info from a tabloid reporter...Schiller's book was credible IMO and if you think not, then we have to...

Schiller'b Book: Page 573--On November 14, the grand jury met for the fourteenth time. That week the CBI leaked to a journalist that the DNA of a second person and possibly a third person---had been discovered on JonBenet's underpants. Even though the Police and the CBI had known this since...

I posted this on the DNA thread, but I think it is applicable here as well. FROM THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE January 11, 1998 excerpt: see url below with full article Hunter: "The public may be seeing the Ramseys more as prime suspects than we are. I've never before seen anything like...

FROM THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE January 11, 1998 excerpt: see url below with full article HuNter: "The public may be seeing the Ramseys more as prime suspects than we are. I've never before seen anything like the battery upon these people who, wealthy or not, are not receiving the...

for making a good valid point because it is true: the speculation that is was at the point of manufacturer will be argued by the prosecution. Also true that the defense will argue that it came from the perp. A big reason why they weren't indicted 1...until the markers match a perp...

I heard Dr. Lee say it wasn't a DNA case--years back when I was posting--because there wasn't enough markers to identify anyone, only to rule out. The tests are more sophisticated now, so now is the time to ask him if he still thinks that. The reason for the FBI database is to identify the...

Yet there is still unidentified fiber(s), DNA and a shoeprint -- or has the fibers and shoeprint been definitely identified?

I am glad you mentioned Westerfield not leaving any DNA, hair or fibers in the house. Seems the sticking point is that some thinks there should be another crime committed with a child left in the house and a ransom note...However I don't buy that...This is a unique crime just as many more are...

I really am surprised at how many fence sitters or posters that believe the Ramseys are innocent posted on your thread. I just started posting case again and don't know how long I will last , but I didn't see any fence sitters or Ramseys supporters on the thread I posted on, so I will post my...