The laws are clear and support the actions of the officers based on information that is known to date based on the MSM media reports.
One can research Graham v Connor, Tenn. v Garner, Terry v Ohio, and the US Constitution 4th amendment for the facts around public/police interaction and Use of...
No disrespect, but are you familiar with AMERICAN law?
The question was around Attempted Murder. The lawyer would have no absolute way of knowing if he was wanted or not UNTIL CHILDRESS WAS ARRESTED, IN CUSTODY, AND REQUESTED A LAWYER AND IT HAPPENED TO BE THAT ONE THAT'S SPEAKING TO THE MEDIA...
I don't believe you understand the arson event and they purchase those allotments to graze public land. They have been encroached upon by the Government reneging on the purchases.
The arson was a grass fire that got into "public" lands from their land and they served their sentence. then a...
Just a guess based on experience, that at a minimum, there was at least a warrant for failure to appear.
Being a "suspect" in attempted murder, under surveillance, failure to appear and then in flight were all likely factors in why the US Marshalls were involved.
semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit. Latin. A maxim in law this is translated as the necessity of proof lies with the person who lays charges.
Seems we have prejudicial treatment as an upholder of the Truth Justice and American Way
that is too quick to assume the thought that...
So a blanket statement of problems? No specific WRT the topic we are discussing? Hard to address a blanket.
Funny, I trust citizens.
On lethal force. The law of the land is clear on UoF. Apparently some few in the public are unaware of that law or refuse to accept the way it has pretty much...
Allow me to tip you....The lawyer would not know of an attempted murder charge if they were attempting to apprehend a fleeing suspect. all the investigation warrants, and any grand jury would be complete and only THEY would know.
Lawyers wouldn't know anything until suspect was arrested. Make...
<modsnip>
I can guarantee you I don't misconstrue but I am capable of misunderstanding. However I do challenge the BS of innuendo, mis direction, diversion, illogic, etc.
Wait a minute there. You convict the cops in your post for murder of an innocent man, BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED then when rebutted try to use the old but the investigation is showing no witness evidence of him actually having empty hands.
So on one hand you condemn without...
No it's the accusatory posts and then the refusing to respond or discuss ANY issue put to you.
ie, your "High Cap Mags", US Constitutional oath?
The usual crowd here post to spread discord, refuses to address rebutted issues, then runs to post another cop bashing post.
Oh and to edit and add...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.