Recent content by Bc007

If he wanted the work friends to be whitenesses why not offer to drive them to lunch that day? They would have all found him together. The movie plans were already in motion from the day before right? So most likely not plan B for a discovery opportunity.

Wanting to see the doll makes me think they aren't in agreement that it wasn't an accident so they want to determine if it's possible he wasn't visible from the back. Seeing him at lunch would also help determine if it was an accident I guess.

Was there a question about Dr. Diamond?

Depending on how intense her last trial was its possible she doesn't want the job again.

I think the judge should have just given the definition. Her decisions are so odd to me. If they are asking about this- it's my opinion they dismissed the malice murder charge already. If they are asking about the meaning of "wanton" there may be a dispute about negligence. Just my take... I...

I think both closings a were good. I think the defense was smart not to ask for not quiltiea on the sex related charges. What was weird to me- in Boring's closing I felt like he was super confusing when discussing these charges. At one point I feel like he said one of the crimes "wasn't fully...

Something had to happen on the defense side. I won't speculate because doesn't seem like there is much to go on other than they anticipated it would go way longer. This just seems off.

This isn't 100% true. Mostly correct but it depends on where the straps are raised on top and how tight everything is buckled up.

As far as speculation on Diamond I disagree. The info about Ross and been out since he was arrested and shortly there after. If anything, his case has improved over time as state's evidence started to show there was a rush to judgement on some issues. Maybe they couldn't afford him or he had a...

This is crazy - I can't believe this is the last witness!

If they think closing arguments could be Monday them IMO they don't intend to put Ross off the stand.

Correct- felony murder they have to prove intent. 2CC they have to prove a willing recklessness or disregard for the child's safety that one could reason may potential lead to injury or death. That's my understanding anyways.

They still have to show his behavior was wreckless in regards to his parenting and concern for the safety of his child - not his marriage, as it pertains to 2CC.

So the state has to prove he 1) Purposely left him in the car to die for one of the variation of motives they presented despite not needing to present motive at all. I.e. wanted a divorce although texted he was happily married less sex life or for money reasons because "that joker drains his...

To save face they will retry him on lesser charges and throw the book at him on the sexting charges. IMO. Does jury recommend sentencing in this case?