JerseyGirl
Retired Forum Coordinator
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 55,637
- Reaction score
- 192,910
I thought the car seat was in evidence, but the doll isn't.
But they didn't ask for the car seat---just the doll, right? I thought that was weird.
That's what I thought as wellI thought the car seat was in evidence, but the doll isn't.
Not FBS as such. But, Kilgore did spend about 15 minutes in opening discussing it in all but name, a preview of Brewer's testimony, which also didn't use the term but which did lay out all the elements of FBS.
I was interested how little emphasis Kilgore placed on the possibility in closing, but IMO that was because he wanted to focus the jury on the question of intent (that the State didn't meet it's burden of proof) rather than have the jury begin deliberations discussing whether or not it was possible for RH to have forgotten Cooper. Just a guess.
Jen's Trial Diaries‏ @TrialDiariesJ
Judge said no on Cooper doll. Bet they wanted to put him in the car seat #hotcardeath #Rossharri
I know you know this, but opening and closing statements are not evidence. Based on the evidence presented during the trial, I don't see how the jurors even consider FBS as a possible explanation for Ross's actions.
They can make a doll out of sweaters or other clothing!? They have Coopers measurements it would not be hard to do that. They may not have a ruler but they can use the joint measurement on their index finger....it is about an inch. There are ways to get around the 'no doll'. They want to see just how much higher Cooper sat over the back of the baby car seat.
Wanting to see the doll makes me think they aren't in agreement that it wasn't an accident so they want to determine if it's possible he wasn't visible from the back. Seeing him at lunch would also help determine if it was an accident I guess.
If I was a juror, one of the key questions up for deliberation would be if Ross could see or hear Cooper on the way from CFA to HD. If they believe he could, there is no possible "forgetting". If he couldn't, then it's all up for debate. I wonder if that's what wanting the doll is about.
Brewer's testimony was evidence, and imo, compelling evidence, up to the point of the cues, where imo he went a bit wobbly.
Such a happy huge smile and RH even fist bumped his lawyers. He thinks he will go free....he is not even looking at the time he will get for sexting with under age females! GRRRRR.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-arguments-jury-prepares-discuss-verdict.html