Recent content by crasshopper

Yes it is.... agree he is so shady & i think as we become privy to evidence and friend's statements his manipulative abusive behavior will be exposed. i honestly think he assaulted her because she wanted out of the relationship permanently & he wanted to keep controlling her and her...

Your kind and probably honest :) I am not casting doubt on Woolie's integrity but as you acnowledge it was odd for a man of his experience. He is more often a defense expert and by now very well aware of the best tactics, Roux probably didn't even have to spell it out. (my speculation) The...

Barnacle has no idea what we have in store!!! (or perhaps he does)

1st bolded part- Thank you for clarifying proper SA procedure. There was some debate. 2nd bolded part- ROFL Now one more question :) Do you care to share whether you think OP is guilty and which conviction the evidence supports or what you feel is the greatest weakness of the state's...

lol, the DM ;)

Obviously we are all thrilled to have you and I'm gald you didn't find that over the top, suddenly I questioned whether the lack of decorum might not be appreciated. Too kind but I digress, must finish reading all your posts!

hmmm, don't know enough to dispute further...perhaps 'permissible' in SA but the SA commentary I watched thought it a detriment to the DT. Perhaps she will assign it little value when they write their decision. Possibly just as the judge allowed the inadmissible previous consistent statements...

So sorry, but here you go! :balloons: :welcome: :welcome6: :wagon: Lovely having you here, I'm pretty new too :-)

Mine was a little over the top so I'm tagging on to yours :-)

Yes but what do you think about not submitting a final report to the opposing team during discovery.

:welcome: From a relative newbie too :-) Thoughtful post indeed. I think when Woolie admitted he watched earlier ( Mangena's) testimony and revised his notes he conceeded to 'tailoring.' Highly irregular and flauts standards of discovery. He's a professional...there was no oversight...

[/i] Don't apologize, Your Interjections of well placed levity highlighting the preposterous and incongruous is obviously well meaning. Doesn't even approach the macabre of gallows humor or that of the trenches. Thank you for the many chuckles.

'Round Table' is 1000% better than any commentary I've heard on US TV. Many, many thanks to you & Lithgow.

That was my recollection too! I also wonder about the force of recoil with each shot and questioned whether the 'accuracy' of the four shots might support his being on prosthetics....but then I discounted that thought ;)

That was priceless!