Recent content by Huskerdoo62

  1. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    For me, I believe the sequence goes as follows. Dani disappears. LE gets information during their investigation that points to FG as being one of, if not the last, person to be seen with her. They bring him in for questioning and he refuses to cooperate. LE can get subpoenas and warrants...
  2. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    I thought when LE did the first reported search, it was stated they didn't consider the house a crime scene. They were just looking for evidence of what may have happened. Sorry if my my recollection is bad. Very hard catching up on this. Everything you read starts to blend together. I'm...
  3. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    I would believe that LE made the determination that she was the victim of a crime once they determined she was not away of her own volition. The determination of being a victim of a crime was probably part of their justification to a judge for the search warrants used.
  4. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    This is why it always made sense to me as to why they took the mattress. At the end of the day, the two DNA profiles LE should get from it are the home owners. It's the case for anyone. Your DNA is gonna be on your bed. Now can they conclusively say it's FGs DNA they found on that bed without...
  5. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    Here's the question I was wondering about earlier (hoping this is ok to ask)... About the floor boards that were removed. Does anyone know what room they were removed from and how much of an area was taken? They would presumably take a larger portion than necessary to preserve any evidence...
  6. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    Thanks. DNA would be most likely since they took the mattress. They should be to determine male or female from the samples they got. His being there is a given. As would be his wife's. It's their mattress. Unless they got a warrant for his DNA, they have had to wait until the court ordered...
  7. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    Thank you for the link, I'll read up in a couple. Is there anything off limits when discussing known evidence? I am wondering about some of the things from FGs residence, but my questions would probably be disturbing for Dani's family or friends who are here. I have no desire to bring added...
  8. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    Do we know if they found clothing from Hines Park or Dani at FGs residence?
  9. H

    MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

    I've just started following this case once the arrest was made in the Hines Park case. Is there somewhere that has a listing of what evidence/facts are known from LE and other reliable sources? I've tried reading up on some of the earlier discussion threads, but I'm so late I feel it will take...

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
985
Total visitors
1,107

Forum statistics

Threads
632,327
Messages
18,624,743
Members
243,089
Latest member
WofleWaffle
Back
Top