Does Brennan understand that JOK’s diagnoses or cause of death really isn’t in question it’s the MECHANISM of injury that’s in question. You have no proof of how he died Hank. The End.
I keep thinking this too but I think they’ve had their anger target as Read from the start and still need it. I get it, anyone who has experienced unnatural death of a loved one understands there is a need to place blame.
AJ point about the taillight being incapable of lighting after Proctor had it but had been illuminated prior is all I need to hear. The only link the CW had to a collision is the taillight pieces and that 1000% removes that “evidence”
I don’t think so at all. If anything if someone on the jury hadn’t thought of that possibility yet it opened the door for them. Really dumb comment by Brennan.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.