Recent content by QuietMind

  1. Q

    2011.06.25 Sidebar Thread (Trial Day Twenty-eight)

    Sorry, their names escape me, but the DT did have two psychiatrists they wanted during this phase of the trial - the original Dr. that examined KC at the very beginning under JS orders and a second one. The SA was taking the deposition of the first Dr. and it was called off in the middle when...
  2. Q

    2011.06.25 Sidebar Thread (Trial Day Twenty-eight)

    Not me. This is just more innuendo that JB is spreading through his contacts in trying to further his OS. Only problem for him is the court of public opinion are not the ones he needs to have buy into this theory - the jury are the ones he should be focussing on. However, running a proper...
  3. Q

    2011.06.25 Sidebar Thread (Trial Day Twenty-eight)

    Personally I don't believe a word of it, but that is what JB threw out there for the jury in his OS and it seems he is still putting that out there through his buddy GR. The problem for JB is to get some testimony/evidence into court that actually backs this up - hasn't happened so far, so all...
  4. Q

    2011.06.25 Sidebar Thread (Trial Day Twenty-eight)

    BMM - I think that is a valid point, for both Baez and Ashton -remember, a good lawyer should never ask a question for which he does not know the answer. That being said, there is still time for LA, CA and GA to be back on that stand and if we are to believe GR :floorlaugh: they will be and...
  5. Q

    Defense doesn't want GA & CA in the courtroom....why?

    At one of the hearings, HHJP suggested that both the SA and the DT go up and familiarize themselves with all the technology in the room. Perhaps William "Thwarted" has been taking lessons...... :floorlaugh:
  6. Q

    Defense doesn't want GA & CA in the courtroom....why?

    Wow....I just posted what I had heard in response to someone else's question. Thanks for the clarification. I will just go back to lurking.
  7. Q

    Defense doesn't want GA & CA in the courtroom....why?

    Thanks for the welcome. :seeya: Here is a link to Courtroom 23 so you can see the actual position of the tables and can take a virtual tour of the courtroom. http://www.ninja9.org/courtadmin/mis/courtroom_23.htm Moving to the side tables is going to be interesting, as had they kept...
  8. Q

    Defense doesn't want GA & CA in the courtroom....why?

    I am not sure that they wanted 6 seats though, I thought CA had originally said 4 and then someone said the SA offered 6, but later someone said the SA only offered 2 and the A's wanted 3 - for GA, CA and 1 lawyer. :waitasec:
  9. Q

    Defense doesn't want GA & CA in the courtroom....why?

    Here is the link for the seating chart. No special designated seating for GA and CA. http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/may/239906/Court-releases-seating-chart-for-Casey-Anthony-case If it is true they turned down the kind offer of the SA to use some of their reserved seating, then...

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
394
Total visitors
507

Forum statistics

Threads
625,732
Messages
18,508,894
Members
240,837
Latest member
TikiTiki
Back
Top