Recent content by sunflowers

wow. i just finished reading through all of this. thanks for the links. very interesting that attorneys are citing this case....

now that i realize the separation agreement hadn't been executed, i'm also thinking the reality of what a divorce would cost him financially raised his ire considerably & made him a bit crazed with anger & rage made him more & more furious & on edge. Easier to be set off at the drop of a hat...

Thanks. Somehow I had forgotten that they hadn't signed it, and therefore hadn't agreed to it. Interesting. perhaps he didn't want to agree to giving up any $$----he may have had ZERO understanding of what the NC law requires in terms of community property, alimony & child support.

maybe. but in the previous years, it seemed that brad worked, worked out, did his MBA, did Iron Man, and Nancy did the kid stuff. i'm not sure how much they were really together as a "family" the other wierd thing that i've wondered about is why brad agreed to pay for the girls' private...

or, if he killed nancy as many of us think, too bad he didn't babble by calling 911 after nancy died, and babble about "OMG, we were fighting, etc" instead of disposing her like garbage.

yes. i wondered, too. and think it's likely. it's one of the few things that would make a judge so quickly completely grant temp custody to an extended family member out of the country without input from LE or any real facts about anything. it just doesn't happen like that, so there's...

also, remember that it was VERY HOT here in July. If he wore sandals on one trip, I'm surprised that he wasn't wearing sandals on both trips since it he was just making quick trips & those of us who wear sandals for quick trips would tend to do it consistently.....

With most people, it's absolutely the right thing to put the person on the stand. For some reason, his attorneys quite consciously decided not to put him on the stand, and also not to put his famlly on the stand. It's so totally strange that he wasn't put on the stand---tells me that his...

only sent a subpoena to the CC HT? i would suggest that's all they did because they already knew the answer they wanted so it was best to keep only 1 store in the loop. this info was for their PR campaign---not to see if their client might be guilty. they wanted the public to view brad...

it seems to me that the psychologist may have advised that the girls not have face-to-face time with brad when they were in NC. it could well be that krista & their family was kept more appraised of the investigation than we're aware of. meaning that if they thought there was a high...

thank you

would love to hear more about the yates mill situation.... will post if I find out more info

agreed---seemed like it showed cool behavior & possibly concern that parents or father might say incriminating things about son's personality, behavior, parenting, or suspicion re son's involvement with murder. MH didn't testify either, did he? wondering about his involvement with "that...

missed your insights on this forum. glad you're back to see the indictment

i'd be certain that brad's attorneys made a conscious choice not to put brad or his family members on the stand.