- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 10,700
- Reaction score
- 33,115
If im correct, only her lawyer gets to here them (if there needs to be an objection), she doesnt....
Yesterday, the judge said that they would be reviewed by JA and her attorneys.
If im correct, only her lawyer gets to here them (if there needs to be an objection), she doesnt....
If im correct, only her lawyer gets to here them (if there needs to be an objection), she doesnt....
How does one explain the camera in the hallway?
Remember, the camera was not taking pictures upside down in the bathroom where she claims to have dropped the camera, but deep down in the hallway.
Jodi was remarkably organized for someone in a fog. She managed to get rid of most if not all of the damning evidence. Even took time to delete the pictures, put the knife in the dishwasher, take the load from the washer to put in the dryer and then add the load for the washer. She managed to drag Travis' body and put it in the shower, wash him off, pick up the gun, the camera, the knife, the rope (all of it even though she claimed she did not know what he did with the piece he cut off and, oh yes, re-remembered he put it beside the bed), wash herself off because she left no trail of blood on the way out the door. It also struck me that while she was still in the house Travis' phone rang for the conference call he was suppose to be on. I can't help but wonder they tried more than once to call him but it never snapped her out of her fog. She truly is "Wonder Woman" in a nutshell. jmo
There still would have been evidence of bleeding in the brain. I believe there was not?
Same here, grammie. I am a bit Dum~Dumfounded that there are any questions at all. To me, all of JA's lies = circumstantial evidence of her GUILT.
Who said anything about willfully?
It's true that particularly traumatic memories can become "blocked" and difficult if not impossible to recall. I think she really can't recall all the gruesome details and is manipulating and milking that to her advantage.
marriage proposals and baby names are positive. why didn't they make the journal?
did she write it on a torn out page where she practiced writing 'mrs. travis alexander' 300 times? with hearts over the i's?
Travis has been described as a real horndog by JA. Did any other women testify to having an intimate relationship with him?
While we await the proceedings of the day a question came to me.
Someone recently posted an outstanding account of how one could detect bullets in the chamber of a .25 caliber pistol. Assuming we know what Grandpas gun was like, how would a spent casing be ejected from a single discharge of this particular gun?
It seems to me someone claimed previously that the casing would be ejected to the shooters right side and outward. How does the casings final position on the blood pool comport with JA account of where she was when TA started the linebacker tackle and where the gun accidently discharged?
It seems to me that if the casing were ejected out and to her right side her account of how the shooting went down is a provable lie???
Are there any thoughts out there on this question???
I DO NOT like the fact that Arias and her attorneys will have time to think up lies - I mean answers to the juror's questions.
All other juror's questions were not discussed with Arias first. I want them to be answered off the cuff instead of giving her a chance to think about them.
No idea...did you watch that you tube video Snowshuze posted near the end of the last thread where Travis is talking about a gun at his head - Jodi sprawled all over him like a leech ? He keeps pointing to his right temple, I think she paid attention...
And you think that because?
There's still more defence witnesses, a rebuttal, and closing arguements.
The shell casing couldn't have been ejected from the gun where she said she was standing and landed where it was found.
The chances of it being kicked to where it was found are slim to because the shell casing is very small.
It looks big in the photo but in real life it is quite small.
If it was kicked it would have rolled in blood or water so there would be some residue on it.There is none
In my opinion, whether the gun came first or the stabbing came first is a difference without a distinction. If she brought the gun, she intended to use it...ergo premeditation. If she shot him first, and then felt the need to stab him 28 TIMES and slit his throat to his spinal cord, then that is enough for the cruelty aspect IMO and possibly an even better case for it than stabbing him first and then shooting him, because no one can possibly believe that TA is the incredible Hulk and got angrier and more "ferocious" after being SHOT IN THE HEAD. If she stabbed him and then shot him, the sheer overkill is enough for the cruelty. Either way, she gets the needle.
I do truly believe he thought she had left his house and she made her way back in with the gun. She shot him after the last pic of Travis' shocked look and the flash.
None of the pics prior to the last "accidental" one have a flash. They are also very shaky and crap quality and Jodi claims she is a photographer?!! pffffttt
Not me, I would ask Jodi to demonstrate (with Nurmi as TA) the sequence of events starting with the dropped camera. I would want Juan timing it. That version she gave from the body slam on is ridiculous.
Funny how the video we saw last night about his near death encounter of having a gun held at his head for a long period of time does not match him going after her when he can see she is holding a gun in her hand.