Originally Posted by neenee15
I though this was telling:
1:46 p.m ET: Juror question: Why should we believe you now?
Lying isnt typically something I just do. Im not going to say that I never told a lie in my life before this incident. But the lies that Ive told in this case can be tied directly back to either protecting Travis reputation or my involvement in his death in any way. Because I was very ashamed of the death and also because I wanted to edify Travis in a good way. I didnt want to de-edify him or say hateful things about him especially now that he had passed away. And I also didnt want that to be construed as motive. For example, if he was violent with me, said Arias.
Is she really stupid enough to think anyone would buy that BS? Or does she think if she uses enough words it will confuse the jury into thinking she lied for a good reason, to protect Travis's image. I think it has been well demonstrated that her lies were not limited to this situation. Of course she would just say she lied in those instances to help someone else. Isn't she a saint?
Yes!! she didn't even answer the question, she talked in riddles....and another thing quite telling when she said And I also didnt want that to be construed as motive
She is telling us and the jury although I lied before if I make up this story about abuse, please don't misconstue that as another motive for me to kill him....IMO