whiteangora
I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 5,748
- Reaction score
- -2
![]()
I really have to ask: in this new photo of the back of Zimmerman's head, am I the only person who had a very hard time seeing the source injury for the blood? I had to stare at it for a while to figure out where the bleeding was coming from, and when I saw it I became even more confused; the only wound I can see (at the top of the blood flow on the bottom right) looks like a very small cut or gouge (fingernail wound?), and certainly not the long jagged marks from the "enhanced" photos. That makes no sense to me in the context of the "head being smashed repeatedly against the concrete" story. In fact, the back of his head looks fine. The other wound, based on blood flow, should be right on top of his head, but that's cut off by that big white area. That leads me to my next point:
What is that big white area? I am very bothered by the abrupt line where the blood cuts off; there is no torn skin or wound or anything along that line (that I can see) that would indicate that there's a wound there. If he were wearing a baseball cap or if someone had wiped that area clean, the blood would be smeared, wouldn't it? Not to mention that the line is quite high on his head, and not consistent with where a baseball cap would sit - the bottom of the cap would have been around the tops of his ears, not the crown of his head.
That clean line bugs me. At first I thought that area was just overexposed, but it's not gradual the way it would be in any other photo - in fact, it looks to me like that part of his head was actually edited out. The sides of his head along that area are quite visible, but not that very select area. That bothers me a great deal, and makes me wonder why the only photos that we have which show any damage to his head appear to have been edited in some way.
My response to this picture:
Where is the picture of Trayvon's chest blown apart by a close range gun shot?