- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 4,082
- Reaction score
- 28,244
Again, why would he need to? Why wouldn't he just call "John" to the stand?
I'm fairly confident Phoenix is just using that as an example to better articulate his question.
Again, why would he need to? Why wouldn't he just call "John" to the stand?
It was not a judge that decided not to file charges against GZ initially, it was Mr. Wolfinger, SA. Once GZ was charged he is entitled to ask for a SYG hearing to be heard by the judge. SA could have made that decision and not charged GZ if the evidence showed GZ was telling the truth. For some reason SA feels GZ's statement is not consistent with the evidence for they filed 2nd degree murder charges, which is more than any of us here expected. Most thought it would be manslaughter. jmo
Nope. Just means to make it attractive and pretty. You can embellish and tell the truth at the same time. It's all about word choice and how you phrase it.
I understand that the burden is on the defendant, but if the state has evidence to show that he was standing his ground, would he not be entitled to it?
Maybe Zimmerman was attacked by a mysterious gunman, too. Even Cutcher, who was allegedly right there, didn't know Zimmerman was the shooter.
Nope. Just means to make it attractive and pretty. You can embellish and tell the truth at the same time. It's all about word choice and how you phrase it.
Attractive for Zimmerman's defense story, yes. I think you understand what I'm saying.So you think his brother wanted and adult being in diapers and being spoon fed for life to be seen as something attractive and pretty?
Did Richard Hornsby just say that LE in general is racist?
:what: A mysterious gunman ? what does that have to do with someone not understanding the gravity of the situation ?
Did this guy just come out, not ask any questions and say hey let me get some pics while I'm here !
Wouldn't he have asked GZ what the he!! was going on before snapping away ?
When you use the word embellish to describe a story it usually means adding fictitious details. lol
embellish [ɪmˈbɛlɪʃ]
vb (tr)
1. to improve or beautify by adding detail or ornament; adorn
2. to make (a story) more interesting by adding detail
Why would he need to? Why wouldn't he just call "John" to the stand and get his answers from the horses mouth?
Someone may have perceived Zimmerman as an additional victim of whoever shot Martin. As I stated, Cutcher and her friend didn't think Zimmerman was the shooter initially, either. One of them stood on the porch watching him. It's not a far stretch to think that you hear a gunshot, see someone without a gun, you assume they're a victim, too. Generally people that shoot other people run away.:what: A mysterious gunman ? what does that have to do with someone not understanding the gravity of the situation ?
Did this guy just come out, not ask any questions and say hey let me get some pics while I'm here !
Wouldn't he have asked GZ what the he!! was going on before snapping away ?
I feel that's exactly what the brother did.
Ok, poor example on my part. I'll stick to the facts of the case. Will GZ be able to obtain a copy of John's witness statement and enter it as evidence in the SYG hearing?
--possibly answered by now but..
--from 15 days of charging george, the SA has to hand over ALL of the discovery/evidence they have to date to the defense, and keep on doing so as they get more in...( whether it's good, bad or ugly for the defendant.)
That is not consistent with the phone call information from TM's gf.
Why would he need to? Why wouldn't he just call "John" to the stand and get his answers from the horses mouth?