LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
Yes, but did Zimmerman know that? If not, what difference does it make?
So, instead of sneaking in.... get invited as a guest to a private gated community. Then, go for a walk. Leave the community, maybe going to a convenience store to get some candy. Then return to the gated community, making sure your hoodie is on before you re-enter, making sure you walk around slowly, "checking stuff out", and see what happens. Then, when you get followed by a security guard or security watch person, try to lose him. Then, after you lose him, sneak up behind him, confront him for following you and harassing you, hit him in the face with such force that his nose breaks and he's knocked to the ground, jump on him, and start bashing his head on the sidewalk.
Another way to go is to thank the security person for his diligence, and politely and respectfully explain why you're there.
Do you think one of these approaches might be more likely to get you shot?
1. GZ was not security, not identified as security by wearing a uniform, ID, etc. and could not do so because he was not security and only a private citizen acting as a private citizen. At least if the community had a security officer on duty TM would have been able to identify him.
2. TM did not put his hoodie on until after he was inside the gated community near the club house and it was raining. Certainly not something that should be considered unusual.
3. According to the timeline TM was walking straight home not sneaking around. GZ never identified himself which is evidenced on his call to dispatch. He left his vehicle when he had no obligation to do so.
4. There is no proof TM tried to sneak up on GZ and the SA's investigator said the evidence is to the contrary given the location of the body. Apparently other details GZ gave in his statement just do not line up with the evidence.
5. Why would TM thank someone when he did not know who he was, why he was following him and what he was after? The responsibility of that was with GZ to identify himself, he was the one who was following TM and tracking him down. There is no way GZ can deny that. Normal people do not thank others for harassing and terrorizing them. Had this man tried to follow me I can think of a few words I would have to say to him and they could not be thank you. People get very nervous when they are being followed for no apparent reason.
6. GZ stands alone in the having the responsibility to identify himself and apologize for detaining TM by asking him questions and it should have been done when GZ initially saw TM and he had LE on the line. It would have cleared the matter up without tying up a patrol car. IMO that is pretty clear to everyone by now.
I think the way to insure TM was not shot was for GZ to confront him when he had the chance with LE on the line. He did not do that so the question is why???? GZ went on the make one mistake after another with total disregard for the safety of others. TM was not the only person out walking that night. There was John and there was the young boy walking his dog. Both of them could have been shot. Very irresponsible behavior on GZ's part. jmo