Yes, she spoke in an exclusive interview on ABC on March 20 or 21.
You seem to have some sort of issue about her speaking to Crump while ABC was present since you've mentioned it twice. What's your point?
Yes, she spoke in an exclusive interview on ABC on March 20 or 21.
Have all the 911 calls from that night been released?
Did any of the known 911 callers describe "shadows" or "figures" of two people, with one chasing the other? TIA
You seem to have some sort of issue about her speaking to Crump while ABC was present since you've mentioned it twice. What's your point?
GILBREATH:
- We have Mr. Zimmerman's statements,
- we have the shell casings
- and we had Mr. Martin's body.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1204/20/cnr.02.html
O'MARA: So he said before he knew anyone else saw or did not see what had happened, he gave a statement saying he went back to his car, correct?
GILBREATH: No. Towards his car.
O'MARA: Sorry. You're right. He went towards his car. Seemingly away from Mr. Martin, though, correct?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1204/20/cnr.02.html
GILBREATH: Because the location he was found in .is probably .and I dont have the exact measurements .its in the path to the back door of the house where he was staying.
OMARA: I think the evidence suggested it was 70 yards away, right?
http://www.wral.com/news/video/11004815/#/vid11004815
They would have gotten the records from his physician....would he also manufacture/alter them? I don't think so, JMOGee to me, that sounds like no they didn't ask GZ for the records, why would they ask GZ for records that he could manufacture or alter?
Hi Suzi - actually I don't have a problem at all with it. In context, my statement makes more sense.
Thank you for finding this. The revelations, narratives, and details Crump provided (as well as things he left out) at that press conference are IMO highly interesting to say the least. That is one sleuthy treasure trove of a transcript. Thanks again.Just adding to this:
"On March 20th Benjamin Crump held a major press conference where he revealed that he was in possession of a sworn affidavit from Trayvons 15-year-old girlfriend <modsnip>.
We took another step in this what has been a daily journey for the past three and a half weeks.
Mr. Martin, on Sunday evening [March 18th], was working with his cell phone account, trying to figure out Trayvons password. And he looked on it, and he saw who the last person was that Trayvon Martin talked to while he was alive.
He called me late Sunday night and told me that he had called the young lady, and he told me, and I was just utterly shocked when he told me the time that they talked. They had talked all that day, about 400 minutes, starting that morning to the afternoon. Like many teenagers do, they talked on the phones."
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1203/20/cnr.03.html
Thank you for finding this. The revelations, narratives, and details Crump provided (as well as things he left out) at that press conference are IMO highly interesting to say the least. That is one sleuthy treasure trove of a transcript. Thanks again.
He does say they were dating. He also says "puppy love," and quotes the GF as having called TM "Baby" on the phone that night. Crump's recounting of what she says she overheard, as well as his account of how the phone call ended, I find fascinating. JMO
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1203/20/cnr.03.html
I guess I'm just not getting why you keep stressing the point that ABC was exclusively present. Maybe you could explain?
From the Bond Hearing transcript:
From the Bond Hearing recording at the [1:19:55] mark:
I'm wondering at what point will the disparity between these two statements become apparent to Attorney O'Mara?
"He went towards his car. Seemingly away from Mr. Martin, though, correct?" versus "I think the evidence suggested it was 70 yards away, right?"
Did he have any keys? I didn't see any mention of it when they described what was in his pockets. I heard 22 dollars, an iced tea and the skittles.
Not the witness that saw red.Hmm.. I thought witnesses said they were "wrestling" and "grappling?" JMO
I found it quite the read myself. Everything happened so quickly that weekend. On Friday, the 16th the 911 tapes were released to the family, on the 18th, the call was found by Tracy, he called her, on the 20th Crump was giving a very long-winded press conference about this new development.
I find it so odd that the moment TM started running, 7:12, is the moment he gets a call from his g/f. Almost too perfect, IMO.
You know you are right. Even the male caller on the 911 tape says they were wrestling.Hmm.. I thought witnesses said they were "wrestling" and "grappling?" JMO
I see what you are saying, but my common sense tells me people don't scream when they are on top of and pummeling someone. I think GZ was yelling for help - as opposed to shooting TM, but no one would help, obviously. JMO
That's what he said. Don't know if that was a mistake or there is more that we don't know. One of the witnesses on the phone with 911 said he heard two shots... or at least thought he did. Time will tell?
Have all the 911 calls from that night been released?
Did any of the known 911 callers describe "shadows" or "figures" of two people, with one chasing the other? TIA
I'm so sorry you took that as sarcasm or personally. I don't know where the picture was taken from, but I have an iPhone and I've taken photos with it using the 5x zoom, so I know the capabilities. I just can't see, unless it was an officer, anyone not part of the crime scene being allowed to stand over GZ snapping pictures. JMO Do you know where the photos with the time stamp on them would be? I can't seem to locate any. TIA
I don't understand why you are disgusted by someone taking a picture of GZ's head, there were officers on scene immediately administering CPR to TM.
Before this picture came out, everyone was wanting pictures and saying no one took pictures or evidence at the scene, now that we have a picture, there's something sinister about. It's almost like folks are mad now that the picture exists.:waitasec:
JMO