- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,280
- Reaction score
- 8,048
Now Dr. Baden... wow. It's a DT lineup tonight.
ok - but let's not take that as a DT slanted show - after all the DT has been putting on their case the past few days
Now Dr. Baden... wow. It's a DT lineup tonight.
ok - but let's not take that as a DT slanted show - after all the DT has been putting on their case the past few days
Breaking news: Geragos thinks that Dr. Spitz was the better pathologist.
Sorry, I have to agree that it is DT slanted.
Does anyone remember when Scott Peterson was first being investigated, Garagos came out, "he's guilty."" blah blah blah. He suddenly changed his tune, all of a sudden he joined Scott's team. Something tells me he might want in this one.
Always liked Fuhrman, still think he got a bad rap with OJ. But he is very fair and explains his points well. He knows his stuff.
Thanks! I would normally watch because I have always liked the Judge, and maybe I still will-But I have to admit that what LP said about her hand in going to the Anthonys the other night disturbed me. Of course, if it's down to believing LP and HHJP, I would go with her. I wonder what she has to say about that night and if she'll address it-Guess I have to watch to see!
They want it both ways. Dr G didn't test for this. Well, Dr S should have. Their answer is well, Dr. S didn't have a lab. Oh please. Well, at least Wecht seemed to come around to logic's side.
... What I think is odd is GA calling his lawyer then 911 because a news crew was on Hope Springs.... Even if you believe the BS that was reported via the MSM that they knocked on the door... it is laughable.. who calls 911 because you hear a knock on the door? and your lawyer.. could get expensive IMHO...
Baden - "A shoddy autopsy." Oh no he didn't!
No kidding. They are not hiding those reports the DT can introduce them any time. The won't because they know it means nothing.Cherry picking? The defense is not?