2008.11.20 The Significance of Cindy's "Silent Interview"--Did Cindy "Know"?

[magic-cat]

George also told SB (paraphrasing); "We probably won't be together when this is over."

And my question is why would they want to be together as they call it?
I mean, there is obviously NO honesty between them. There is a complete lack of trust. There is no sincerity and everything is all a big act. Then there is the infidelity issues, or alleged ones and I just cannot see what it is that these folks are hanging on for? Image is the only thing I can think, but I hate to be the one to inform them of this fact, but their image could not get worse I don't believe. A divorce might actually IMPROVE their image from where I stand. This marriage does not seem to be a marriage to me at all...:waitasec:

 

[affinity]

And my question is why would they want to be together as they call it?
I mean, there is obviously NO honesty between them. There is a complete lack of trust. There is no sincerity and everything is all a big act. Then there is the infidelity issues, or alleged ones and I just cannot see what it is that these folks are hanging on for? Image is the only thing I can think, but I hate to be the one to inform them of this fact, but their image could not get worse I don't believe. A divorce might actually IMPROVE their image from where I stand. This marriage does not seem to be a marriage to me at all...:waitasec:

agreed! Divorce would actually improve their image! They won't listen to anyone--but the best policy is always honesty. If they ever started telling the truth their stock would go up. That is the thing about people---they like and admire truthfulness. Imagine if one of them, any of them would come forward and say: "I apologize for not trusting the police, I apologize to the searchers, too. I was misguided and upset. I hope you can forgive me" <---if any of the Anthonys could manage that with any amount of earnest/decent behavior to go along with the words---they would be able to move along in society just fine. As it stands now....no...they'll continue to be despised for their facade and lies.

 

[newsaddict]

I am new at searching threads, I didn't see this when I searched and didn't know if anyone has seen this clip. Kinda interesting.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmGLTPZqBHU[/ame]

 

[Horace Finklestein]

I think when you look at the interviews with Cindy, especially the freudian slip about Caylee not being in the woods, it's obvious she does know some version of the truth. She knows Casey is responsible, no doubt through a lengthy BS story of some kind, but she knew Caylee was deceased. Another giveaway imo is her bizarre anger about people looking for a 'dead caylee' instead of a 'live caylee'. It's Cindy's mission in life to protect Casey now. moo

Also, we do know GA was lying about seeing the pizza, right, because there was no pizza found?

 

[affinity]

I think when you look at the interviews with Cindy, especially the freudian slip about Caylee not being in the woods, it's obvious she does know some version of the truth. She knows Casey is responsible, no doubt through a lengthy BS story of some kind, but she knew Caylee was deceased. Another giveaway imo is her bizarre anger about people looking for a 'dead caylee' instead of a 'live caylee'. It's Cindy's mission in life to protect Casey now. moo

Was this "woods" thing before or after the silent interview? I can't locate the date.

There is an interesting discussion about the "woods" thing on Dr. Glass' website:
http://drlillianglassbodylanguageblog.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/did-george’s-defensive-body-language-and-cindy’s-woods-comment-early-on-indicate-that-they-may-have-known-caylee-was-already-dead-when-people-searched-for-her/

 

[Kat]

Was this "woods" thing before or after the silent interview? I can't locate the date.

There is an interesting discussion about the "woods" thing on Dr. Glass' website:
http://drlillianglassbodylanguageblog.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/did-george’s-defensive-body-language-and-cindy’s-woods-comment-early-on-indicate-that-they-may-have-known-caylee-was-already-dead-when-people-searched-for-her/

Hi affinity. I am very interested in the time line of these videos and although I have not followed Caylee's case as closely as others I hope that someone will provide a timeline specific to these videos and info in this thread.

I did a search and the closest date that I could up with is this:

(Here is a media report of the interview, the date may be off a few days?)

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/17855547/detail.html

POSTED: Friday, October 31, 2008
UPDATED: 10:26 am EDT October 31, 2008

...The Anthonys spoke to Local 6 News reporter Adam Longo, the first time they've talked publicly since the forensic results were released.

"George and I don't believe that Caylee is in the woods or out there," Cindy Anthony said. "We believe someone has her, and that she's alive."...

That should help to narrow down the time line as far as when this interview happened (It would have had to have been either on or prior to theposting of that media article 31 OCT 2008 IMHO) . If all else fails it is possible to write to the reporter named above and respectfully and concisely ask for the date of that particular interview if it can't be found on the internet.

 

[Reagan]

I think when you look at the interviews with Cindy, especially the freudian slip about Caylee not being in the woods, it's obvious she does know some version of the truth. She knows Casey is responsible, no doubt through a lengthy BS story of some kind, but she knew Caylee was deceased. Another giveaway imo is her bizarre anger about people looking for a 'dead caylee' instead of a 'live caylee'. It's Cindy's mission in life to protect Casey now. moo

Also, we do know GA was lying about seeing the pizza, right, because there was no pizza found?

*hisses at your avatar*

He saw the pizza box and made the assumption that pizza was in there, but you are correct, there was no pizza in that box. It's not like he went digging in that trash, so I'm not sure why he assumed there was pizza IN there.

dumbest.excuse.ever

P.S. Eidetic - It was James H who was also told that GA and CA would probably divorce because they felt like they threw the scantily clad princess under the bus.

 

[DaughterAlice]

Hi affinity. I am very interested in the time line of these videos and although I have not followed Caylee's case as closely as others I hope that someone will provide a timeline specific to these videos and info in this thread.

I did a search and the closest date that I could up with is this:

(Here is a media report of the interview, the date may be off a few days?)

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/17855547/detail.html

POSTED: Friday, October 31, 2008
UPDATED: 10:26 am EDT October 31, 2008




That should help to narrow down the time line as far as when this interview happened (It would have had to have been either on or prior to theposting of that media article 31 OCT 2008 IMHO) . If all else fails it is possible to write to the reporter named above and respectfully and concisely ask for the date of that particular interview if it can't be found on the internet.

This is kind of worth a thread all by itself. The "woods" comment is SIGNIFICANT. Also, if you read the Dr. Glass article all the way through, there is s fascinating theory on how GA & CA might have been setting up RC to be Zanny. It all fits together like puzzle pieces.

I've heard all the stories individually, but when I fit certain pieces together & look at the total picture, it makes me sick. What an UGLY image that begins to form!!

 

[gngr~snap]

newsaddict~ I am new at searching threads, I didn't see this when I searched and didn't know if anyone has seen this clip. Kinda interesting.

Might be CA's smoking gun.... ya never know!

I honestly believe that the things CA has said, in the 911 call and in media interviews will be her downfall and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she has known all along.

Her statements recorded in her voice and she still thinks she can "undo" them by just saying she never said it? WE HAVE RECORDINGS! and not just that but we have HER on camera making statements that she cannot retract! And that everyone will believe her because why?
Plain and simple she ran her mouth too much! She will end up putting herself behind bars IMO and when it happens it will be a priceless moment! MOO

 

[newsaddict]

This is kind of worth a thread all by itself. The "woods" comment is SIGNIFICANT. Also, if you read the Dr. Glass article all the way through, there is s fascinating theory on how GA & CA might have been setting up RC to be Zanny. It all fits together like puzzle pieces.

I've heard all the stories individually, but when I fit certain pieces together & look at the total picture, it makes me sick. What an UGLY image that begins to form!!

Do you have the link to Dr. Lillian Glass article here? I was just reading her analysis in Haleigh case! TIA!!

 

[newsaddict]

NEVERMIND! I scrolled up and got it now duh! Ty anyway! Lol Yes I did read that earlier. It is an interesting thought. I agree w/ what she said how GA & CA SHOULD be punished to the full extent of the law if it's proven!

 

[CuriousTwo]

newsaddict~ I am new at searching threads, I didn't see this when I searched and didn't know if anyone has seen this clip. Kinda interesting.

Might be CA's smoking gun.... ya never know!

I honestly believe that the things CA has said, in the 911 call and in media interviews will be her downfall and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she has known all along.

Her statements recorded in her voice and she still thinks she can "undo" them by just saying she never said it? WE HAVE RECORDINGS! and not just that but we have HER on camera making statements that she cannot retract! And that everyone will believe her because why?
Plain and simple she ran her mouth too much! She will end up putting herself behind bars IMO and when it happens it will be a priceless moment! MOO

And, can you even imagine what a fiasco this is going to be when she's on the stand and the prosecution restates all these "mistruths" and asks her for clarification? LOL!

 

[logicalgirl]

And, can you even imagine what a fiasco this is going to be when she's on the stand and the prosecution restates all these "mistruths" and asks her for clarification? LOL!

Nope - I think the really goodie part is going to be when she is declared a hostile witness and they narrow her down to yes or no answers only..........:argue:..........:croc:

 

[DaughterAlice]

NEVERMIND! I scrolled up and got it now duh! Ty anyway! Lol Yes I did read that earlier. It is an interesting thought. I agree w/ what she said how GA & CA SHOULD be punished to the full extent of the law if it's proven!

Glad you found it! yeah, I totally screwed up Kat's post when I quoted it. I blame it on this stupid laptop. My hands must drag over the mouse pad when I type, and suddenly my cursor is in a different part of the text, typing over things it shouldn't. In this case I tried to correct for it, and ended up deleting part of her quote (the part with the link, of course!).

Yeah, I'm beginning to believe more & more that they should NOT be allowed to escape prosecution.

 

[chefmom]

I agree with all who think that CA knew in this silent interview. As to the slip about Caylee in the woods, I am pretty sure it was prior to the silent interview. As far as the G & A staying together, G better wise up, run for the hills, and start coming clean before trial because, IMO, if it comes down to obstruction charges being brought against them, I think CA will throw GA under the bus so fast it will make his head spin! She will say it was all his idea to say everything because being an ex LE he knew how to get away with it. She will say that she and KC wanted to call LE but that GA said he would take care of everything!

 

[beach]

bumpity-bump

 

[Solace]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FpteGu0PL0

If this question belongs in a prior particular thread, please move.
I hope that we can discuss this interview and what can be gleaned from CA's demeanor.

This "interview" is the only interview where CA says nothing. It is totally out of character for her to be quiet. Though it can be hypothesized that CA was finally worn out from so many interviews, or simply wrung out and/or drugged..the timing of the interview is important:

date: November 15/16, 2008 D C and Hoover search woods
date: November 20, 2008 Cindy's "Silent" interview
date: Dec 11, 2008 Caylee's remains found

Somewhere in one of the threads here I recall seeing someone's assessment of this interview. They wrote something like: "Clearly, she knew. She is acting as if she has just gotten terrible news. Conversely, George acts as if nothing is different from the day before".

Is this interview and CA's behavior (and lack of words) suggestive of the day that CA learned that Caylee was dead? Do we know how she acted the day before and the day after this interview?

Wow, I had not seen this interview. She is totally medicated. Lost. The blackest circles under her eyes.

Sean Kraus says it was around this time I believe that he told Cindy on the phone that he believed KC was responsible. She did not hang up on him. She was just silent. She also told him that she agreed with him that KC is a sociopath and she said she believed taht KC had something to do with the disappearance.

 

[Solace]

Cindy sure did recover quickly from whatever happened in mid-Nov. 08.

You're right, that look on George's face on the may 2009 LKL show is priceless! If ever I've seen a face that says WTF?? that is it!

Yep, he does not believe her - almost like "are you kidding, jesus Cindy hope we don't get caught in that one"

 

[beach]

Wow, I had not seen this interview. She is totally medicated. Lost. The blackest circles under her eyes.

Sean Kraus says it was around this time I believe that he told Cindy on the phone that he believed KC was responsible. She did not hang up on him. She was just silent. She also told him that she agreed with him that KC is a sociopath and she said she believed taht KC had something to do with the disappearance.

BBM

Can you remind me who Sean Kraus is?? :waitasec:

 

[Purple Iris]

What IF when DC and Hoover went to the woods-it was planned right down to the videos. And what IF they actually did find Caylee's remains and did not disturb them (MUCH) but only reported back to Cindy that she was in fact there. Perhaps the videos were to throw us (society at large including LE) off. What if they actually found her and they just didn't remove her for whatever reason? Could he have reomoved SOMETHING that he was TOLD to remove, or things? Is that in the realm of possibility? Like for instance, I don't know, ummm, where are her shoes?

I've just started reading this thread, so, if someone has mentioned this after what I am quoting above, sorry ~

I have ALWAYS thought that the filming of this search was indeed to be used as a "cover", so to speak.
And, I also believe that DC found Caylee's, and, with the elements and animals, there was no way that he could remove/recover her remains. But, as mentioned by MagicCat, it doesn't mean that DC couldn't have taken things from the crime scene. It wouldn't surprise me at all.

Concidering though that all of the things found with Caylee, that lead straight back to the Anthony home, what could have been taken from the site?