2009.05.28 Motions Hearing

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #141
Once it's out there, it's part of the public record Yes? No?
 
  • #142
Oh---please make JB sit down and shut up. This is embarrassing.
 
  • #143
  • #144
Once again JB is asking the judge to just "trust him" in regards to keeping people's information private....Doesn't he understand that the court is not there to "trust him," but to process his formal requests and apply law?
 
  • #145
  • Judge "tell me why you want it, not what they did wrong."
  • JB - not fair! We shouldn't have to tell why... i.e. RK shouldn't have reason to object. We don't have to tell why we want this
  • Judge - "who are you interested in finding out about?"
  • JB - RK's lawyer would be willing to compromise if defense signed non-disclosure & records sealed
  • off on a tangent that THEY won't turn it over to the media... :rolleyes:
  • Judge is fine if they all reach accommodations
  • Judge is there to make decision
  • JB - if this is a privacy issue "I can assure you that I will keep them private as I have in other instances when I was accused of leaking.)
  • Linda D - notes there are responsibilities they need to observe legally
 
  • #146
Can someone catch me up? I just got on!

Thanks!
 
  • #147
Baez is wasting the court's time, he's all over the place.
He throws out the stupidist statements, poor Judge Strickland is
even getting confused and giddy.
 
  • #148
we're seeing history in the making, in glorious high def.
a. lyon is what kc will look like, after spending 30 years
in a fla. prison for murder. :woohoo:
 
  • #149
If JB said they were suspects is there now an opening for "slander" charges against JB?? If anyone said KC was the "murderer" during this case what would he do?? I really am wondering? Or....because it was said in the courtroom does it become a non-issue.
 
  • #150
Hearing4.jpg


Oh my ..
 
  • #151
I'm really liking Jesse's lawyer!
 
  • #152
Jose, once again not drafting a motion correctly :rolleyes:
 
  • #153
Jose is not liking what the judge is telling him, resubmit the proper motions!

Jose does not want to (bawawwaw)
 
  • #154
JB wants it all but doesn't want to work for it once again.
 
  • #155
Gonna throw my cup thru this screen if JB says---> "If you will" one more time.
 
  • #156
Camera on GA, no gum!
 
  • #157
Is that brown haired chick the new DP lawyer?
 
  • #158
If JB said they were suspects is there now an opening for "slander" charges against JB?? If anyone said KC was the "murderer" during this case what would he do?? I really am wondering? Or....because it was said in the courtroom does it become a non-issue.

I dunno. The other lawyers didn't object, which I found strange. Unless they couldn't in this hearing.

I think JB is paving the road ahead re JG and AH. Grrrrrrr
 
  • #159
  • Judge speaks to Grund's lawyer
  • "you understand why your client's records are material"
  • JG's lawyer citing more case law
  • Strickland "you want JB to redo motion citing materiality?"
  • JG lawyer "yes, wants materiality & specificity"
  • JB interrupts - Strickland hushes him, "As someone who needs to follow the law" (was that a nice lil' dig from the judge? I think so.)
  • JB rattling on about level of materiality
  • Strickland notes many aren't here to object (RM, A's, etc.)
  • Strickland does think amended motions to each Kronk, RG and AH
  • Judge - need to amend dates to June 08 - possibly to now.
  • JB - arguing "state is not arguing this child died by accident"
  • JB 'there is relevant info prior to date of disappearance'
 
  • #160
Camera on George, he and Cndy must be so proud of their daughter who is willing to throw any one of her friends under the bus, for a crime they dd not commit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
109
Guests online
1,729
Total visitors
1,838

Forum statistics

Threads
632,359
Messages
18,625,275
Members
243,110
Latest member
dt0473
Back
Top