2010.04.23 Document Release

Status
Not open for further replies.
Am I reading it correctly, it seems to state no hairs found in the vaccums. Whose vaccums would not have hair in them, I know mine does. If there were not hairs found then it sounds like someone cleaned the vaccums prior to LE getting them. It was like six months after Caylee disappeared before they got the vaccums so plenty of time to make sure they were nice and clean.

I collect so much hair in my vaccums (regular and a spot bot) that I sometimes have to take them apart and get the hair out of them. You are right it doesn't make sense that there would be so little hair in these vaccums.
 
People shed hair constantly so there should have been at least one hair even if the vacuums had been cleaned. They also have dogs. Very strange.
 
Pls remember to search for and update existing threads w/ information on topics that have updated info in this release. If it is a new topic, pls launch a new thread rather than carrying on in too much detail on any one topic in this doc release thread.
If you do launch a new thread or bump/update an old one it would be really helpful if you bring a link to that thread back here to this one to let people know they can join you there if they have an interest.

Happy Friday & happy sleuthin'!
 
No Hair in Vacumn's ??? Wow Cindy must know how to clean, or they had new ones to give to the LE...something fishy here..

wasn't it the McGuire case they didn't find ANY Fingerprints in the Whole place...? total clean up..what's that tell you.:banghead:
 
I collect so much hair in my vaccums (regular and a spot bot) that I sometimes have to take them apart and get the hair out of them. You are right it doesn't make sense that there would be so little hair in these vaccums.

:waitasec: Not even Dog hairs?
I don't think their dogs shed much if any but hairs do fall out.
 
Hello WS :)

It figures there would be absolutely no hairs in the Anthony's vac cleaners. Only in this case could someone have a vacuum cleaner, several of them...and not one hair is found.

YET! Just from processing the evidence, it seems we have several FBI hairs...sigh. Like other things in this case, it is what they are NOT saying and doing that makes me suspicious.

Maybe they used a different vacuum? That's a wild guess and a stretch, it is just strange that the vacuums should be so clean. :waitasec:

So, what finally made George and Cindy clam up? Hummmm? Had we seen this interview with Cruz/Hollaway? TIA.

Thank you Muzikman for the docs. :blowkiss:

:cow:
 
The way I read it was no hairs showing decomp...I will go back though. They had hairs to test so they found some..
 
You could stuff a mattress with the cat hair, dog hair and people hair that comes out of my house on a weekly basis......hmmmmmmmmmmmm
 
The way I read it was no hairs showing decomp...I will go back though. They had hairs to test so they found some..

If you read page 39-42 it states there were no apparent hairs in the hose and on the brush of the steam cleaner and shop vac. If you looked at my vaccums the haris are very apparent. IMHO I believe these had been throughly cleaned.
 
It's always difficult for me to keep in mind, that from June 16 to Dec 11th ( 6 months) of '08 is a very long time. Surprising ANY EVIDENCE could be found, even if one is not an obsessive cleaner like Cindy!
 
If you read page 39-42 it states there were no apparent hairs in the hose and on the brush of the steam cleaner and shop vac. If you looked at my vaccums the hairs are very apparent. IMHO I believe these had been throughly cleaned.

That is the key, imo. I could understand if no hairs containing decomp were found in the vacuum bags because, in all likelihood, they would have been changed in several months. However, the brushes of the steam cleaner were likely replaced, imo. It would be virtually impossible to remove all trace evidence from those tight brushes. :innocent:

Not surprised at all. They had plenty of time to think about this.
 
If you read page 39-42 it states there were no apparent hairs in the hose and on the brush of the steam cleaner and shop vac. If you looked at my vaccums the haris are very apparent. IMHO I believe these had been throughly cleaned.

I dunno if cleaning would have removed all hair. They may not have used the machines at all, not sure if they would have had time to purchase replacement parts but that is possible as well.

ETA-Remember that GA was a detective....he would know what kinds of things to really look out for as far as covering up/removing evidence. I myself, w/o LE knowledge, would think to replace the machine or parts on it if I had time...And it would not necessarily have been GA doing the clean-up, I am sure he shared some things with CA over the years about how people get away with things. I have a friend whose dad is in the local PD, and he has brought up things that dad would tell him about how people cover up, so it's not unheard of that CA would have a little knowledge about this as well.

But I think I am leaning on them not having used that machine at all.

ETAA: Or they did find hairs but none with decomp-I'm a little unsure how to read this...
 
This family has relatives in the area and could have borrowed a vacuum cleaner or steam cleaner. I wonder if any relatives were asked about this. I mean, my mom wouldn't think anything of it if I'd borrowed her vacuum or steam cleaner.
Still...there should be some hair in the ones taken as evidence.
 
I don't feel like it is worthy of its own thread, so fwiw, I think Sky is full of crap. I didn't find her credible at all. Kind of like Casey-speak....maybe a tiny bit of truth thrown in for good measure. JMHO
 
It's just weird. Reading about all these vacuum cleaners and to keep on reading "no apparent hairs found." But, right after that it says, "no hairs with the characteristics of apparent decomposition located."

So, they are finding hairs but they do not have "characteristics of apparent decomposition?"
 
If you had to vacuum up decomposition from the trunk I don't think you would want to keep the vacuum. You'd never get rid of the smell.
 
So we have to ask ourselves again (I know there is a thread on it, but I wanted to point out that it is not in this dump): Where is MP's depo?
 
So we have to ask ourselves again (I know there is a thread on it, but I wanted to point out that it is not in this dump): Where is MP's depo?

Mallory and DC. I anxiously await both.

I really can't figure out why we haven't seen Mallory's though. :waitasec:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
415
Total visitors
537

Forum statistics

Threads
627,096
Messages
18,538,305
Members
241,183
Latest member
MayBluebird
Back
Top