logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
Not to sound disrespectful in any way, but what you and/or I would do is not really relevant to this case. What is relevant, in this thread in particular, is that there is no evidence that the As vacuums and/or steam cleaners were used to clean the trunk. I was trying to get a feel for where you stood on this subject, and thought upon my clarifying, as per your request, that you would enlighten me with your response.
jmho
I'm happy to respond to your comment. When we discuss a topic on a thread that has evidence not yet proven beyond a doubt, and we are pursuing different options, I use a number of factors before posting an opinion.
For example, you believe the A's vacuum cleaners, at least the ones taken into evidence, showed no evidence being used to clean the trunk. Which to me begs the question - was one piece of equipment disposed of, replaced, or an outside source used.
For me to come to an opinion about a conclusion of evidence, I consider the evidence, the legal experts opinions, and my own logic process. You may not consider your opinions to be relevant when coming to a decision about the evidence at this point before it is presented in isolation before the trial, but to me, mine is.