denjet
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2009
- Messages
- 915
- Reaction score
- -40
BBM
Just wanted to say that Hornsby really caught my attention with this theory of why the SA may have put the DP back on the table. I had never thought about that before, however the timing could not be more telling. Looks like it gives us a sneek-peek into what might have gone on in that in-camera meeting w/JS regarding how the defense has been funded and, possibly, why it has been sealed. :innocent: Also, sheds some light on why the SA has not totally ruled out adding pecuniary gain as an aggravating factor.
I certainly don't know that he is correct, but so far he has been spot-on.
It was a really good show for those who haven't had a chance to listen.
I'm not convinced (yet) that the timing of the state seeking the DP was because of finding out about defense funding ... I always thought it was because they were waiting for evidence testing and reports to be complete ... there were sizable amounts of discovery from Jan to March ... I could change my opinion and that maybe that combined with finding out the amount Jose got paid and the source was the final straw ....:waitasec: