08-02-2010 Order Denying
Motion for Protective Order Regarding a Telephone Recording of Robin Lunceford
So glad to hear that Judge P put a stop to this back and forth Motion filing and made a ruling!
DENIED! Next .....
08-02-2010 Order Denying
Motion for Protective Order Regarding a Telephone Recording of Robin Lunceford
So glad to hear that Judge P put a stop to this back and forth Motion filing and made a ruling!
DENIED! Next .....
Not even a hearing to argue the motion, gotta love it.
Not even a hearing to argue the motion, gotta love it.
I'm watching the site for 9th judicial court, they usually have the docs filed there. No one from media has been to the clerk's office to get this order as far as I can tell, no counter transactions for docs yet today.
I expect it will be soon though.
08-02-2010 Order Denying
Motion for Protective Order Regarding a Telephone Recording of Robin Lunceford
What's that song from a while ago?
"And another one bites, and another one bites, and another one bites the dust!":loser:
:biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:
Oooooo! Where did you read this? I am so happy the motion has been denied! Wonder when we will get to hear it?
I just heard about this on wftv's noon news but it's not on their site yet. Must have just happened. I am looking forward to reading the order and looking forward even more to hearing the phone call. :dance:
Sure hope they don't redact a lot.08-02-2010 Order Denying
Motion for Protective Order Regarding a Telephone Recording of Robin Lunceford
Thank you Steely! I betcha JB is stocking up on the TUMS today.Here's an article;
Anthony Attorney's Call With Inmate To Be Released
Judge Denies Motion To Block Release Of Call
POSTED: Monday, August 2, 2010
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Judge Belvin Perry signed an order Monday morning allowing a recorded phone call between Casey Anthony's defense attorney Jose Baez and an inmate to be made public.
Anthony's defense had asked the judge to grant a motion to keep the call private....
Pretty amusing...RL knows more than to expect the calls to be private, but Baez still puts together the ridiculous argument(s) in his motion. I understand that he needed to do it, but must he always look so bad doing it?Here is the order denying the motion for protective order:
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/24477717/detail.html
...and the State was truthful in their portrayal of the calls as being nothing more than RL's rantings about inmate MD.Thanks so much for this Nums24!
I'm sure you've read this pdf., and will agree with me. HHJP points out several places in Baez's statements where he flat out lied about what happened during the phone calls.
Mr. Baez stated in his motion that he had no idea the calls were being recorded, and his secretary must have accepted the calls before forwarding them on to Baez. HHJP specifically says the defense voice was heard on the tape immediately after pressing "1" to accept the call, and it is clear it was he who heard the recorded warning and accepted the call.
OH OH Baez, I think you got caught big time with a lot more than your hand in the cookie jar. :croc: