Why can't they shackle her to the chair?He didn't rule on the shackeles yet... he said "IF I grant this you understand that it will only be in the courtroom, that once she's on the other side of the door they'll be back on"
Why can't they shackle her to the chair?He didn't rule on the shackeles yet... he said "IF I grant this you understand that it will only be in the courtroom, that once she's on the other side of the door they'll be back on"
what did the judge rule about the shackles?
Maybe it'll be better to bind KC's ankles with 'duct' tape'?
she can have shackles removed while in court but right back on when they leave court.
No he hasn't ruled on that yet. He said he'd take it under advisement, I think.I thought that's what Baez wants but HHJP hasn't ruled yet. Did I miss something?
Did we see CM pass a folded yellow piece of paper to CA????
HHJP - says IF I grant it is only in courtroom - once through threshold they go back on - under advisement
All those in favor, say I.
Okay, we can eat, smoke, pee and read back now! BTW - I appreciated soooooooooooo many more posts than I had time to hit the THANK YOU BUTTON --- SO THANK YOU TO EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I kinda missed that as well...but I think JB withdrew his motion.So Thanks to Chatty Cathy, my client, I was almost half an hour late. Did I miss the whole TES thing or wasn't it dealt with?
I will read back - but wanted the quick answer so I relax and read. Anyone?