Well now... Just how does the friends info fit with this (per LadyBullDogs transcription above):
http://www.king5.com/news/Terri-Hormans-friend-testifies-before-grand-jury--99269984.html
>>A reliable source told KGW that Spicher was doing gardening work not far from the Horman family home in northwest Portland on the day 7-year-old Kyron Horman disappeared. Spicher reportedly left where she was working at 11:15 a.m. on June 4 and returned around 1 p.m.<<
A. she was doing "gardening work" -- how does this fit with attending a class?
B. she was not far from the "Horman family home" -- I believe her home is some distance away from the Horman home?
C. Spicher "left" where she was working, then returned -- working as opposed to attending a gardening class? How do these fit together. She left, she returned
So she left a class? She left work? Which is it?
And...
>>A person who was working with Spicher, who is also cooperating with investigators, told them of trying to unsuccessfully find Spicher. Both people have told investigators they have no idea where Spicher was during that period of time.<<
D. Someone was "working" with Spicher? I thought her friends say she was attending class? Do we call the class "work" or "class" or both?
E. She unsuccessfully tried to find Spicher? She was ditching work? Working elsewhere on the property but couldn't be found? She was ditching 90 minutes or more of a class? So you are either working with someone or at a class with them, yet the person you are with disappears for 90 minutes?
Do you suppose Spicher was having a bowel problem and excused herself without mention for 90 minutes?
There is something wrong with what we are hearing from differing sources.