Ok, I was just over at the ninth court website and found this gem. Not sure if it has been discussed in another thread but I didn't see it in this one.
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...iance With Order for Additional Discovery.pdf
Short and sweet authored by Jeff A. Jose was sent a copy of this along with the list of expert witnesses by email on 22 Dec. 10.
Basically, it's a response to the Dec 10th court order for "clarification to compel compliance with order for additional discovery". Jeff states that of the 38 state witnesses with the classification of expert, 36 submitted or co-signed reports. The two remaining are Christine Ballard and David Bogart.
What caught my attention is Christine who's "field of expertise is forensic anthropology. She will testify as to the creation of a video superimposition involving a photograph of Caylee Anthony in life, a photograph of her skull and a photograph of the duct tape found with her skull."
David is an expert in "radio frequency engineering and his testimony will concern the interpretation of movement and usage patterns of the Defendant's mobile phone."
Mod alert: Please move this to the correct thread if necessary !
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...iance With Order for Additional Discovery.pdf
Short and sweet authored by Jeff A. Jose was sent a copy of this along with the list of expert witnesses by email on 22 Dec. 10.
Basically, it's a response to the Dec 10th court order for "clarification to compel compliance with order for additional discovery". Jeff states that of the 38 state witnesses with the classification of expert, 36 submitted or co-signed reports. The two remaining are Christine Ballard and David Bogart.
What caught my attention is Christine who's "field of expertise is forensic anthropology. She will testify as to the creation of a video superimposition involving a photograph of Caylee Anthony in life, a photograph of her skull and a photograph of the duct tape found with her skull."
David is an expert in "radio frequency engineering and his testimony will concern the interpretation of movement and usage patterns of the Defendant's mobile phone."
Mod alert: Please move this to the correct thread if necessary !
