LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
The statute of limitations for any such libel suit has long since expired.![]()
I think this was for what Brad said last week which just happened.
The statute of limitations for any such libel suit has long since expired.![]()
I simply do not care or find anything interesting in the matter of the Anthony parents feeling wronged. Is this matter supposed to be of interest to the public? To me this has nothing to do with the murder of Caylee or Casey's trial, and is a side circus of self-importance. If they feel wronged, why send your attorney to the media? Just shut up, file if they want, and leave us out of it.
JMO
I agree, he creeps me out the most in that family. I hope I don't get sued for saying that.
Gee, I have read through this whole thread and realized that I am the only one who thinks Mr. Conway should put a cork in it, and fast.
Here is some of what he said last week:
From his dealings with the Anthony family, Conway said he had no doubt they are a normal family and he didnt think anything Casey will say about abuse will stand up.
But shes the only one who can do that. Theyre not going to verify that, Conway said. The jury will have to decide whos lying and whos telling the truth.
bbm
I don't see how BC can make these statements without basing his opinion in whole or in part on conversations with the Anthonys that were covered by the attorney-client privilege. His "dealings" with the family. What they will or will not verify.
This case seems to bring out the worst in everyone.
MOO
http://justice4caylee.forumotion.ne...-throw-parents-under-bus-brad-conway-says-hal
Gee, I have read through this whole thread and realized that I am the only one who thinks Mr. Conway should put a cork in it, and fast.
Here is some of what he said last week:
From his dealings with the Anthony family, Conway said he had no doubt they are a normal family and he didnt think anything Casey will say about abuse will stand up.
But shes the only one who can do that. Theyre not going to verify that, Conway said. The jury will have to decide whos lying and whos telling the truth.
bbm
I don't see how BC can make these statements without basing his opinion in whole or in part on conversations with the Anthonys that were covered by the attorney-client privilege. His "dealings" with the family. What they will or will not verify.
This case seems to bring out the worst in everyone.
MOO
http://justice4caylee.forumotion.ne...-throw-parents-under-bus-brad-conway-says-hal
BBM
Count me as #2. I'll even stick my neck out and say, IMO, NeJame should do the same. I don't know that either have violated privilege, but IMO they are walking a very fine line.
My perspective is how I would feel if my ex-attorney showed up on tv talking about me like these 2 guys are doing, and I wouldn't like it at all.
Yes! I didn't see a memorial. I saw it as a way for Cindy to throw a party just to ban people from attending. It was like she was in high school again and she relished in the idea of telling people: No, you can't come.
I think this was for what Brad said last week which just happened.
(Statute of limitations for libelous statement is two years from date first made. See Fla. Stat. 95.11(4)(g)).......Yup, you are correct LC.
In my opinion anyone who has subjected themselves to the Anthonys should never be surprised at a lawsuit or any other antics they try. Basically if you are not on the "ANTHONY HAND" (Board of Directors) you are not safe to even have a conversation with them.
The A's did make themselves, on their own, public figures. I don't see anything in what BC said that would have A/C Priv. However since BC has had conversations with JB lately I would guess BC was letting the A's know without violating any ethics rules that the bus is coming and they better get their ducks in a row. Guess someone wants their CBS money back.
BC said they were a normal family but they will be portrayed in court as dysfunction and abusive. BC was not stating they are but now since they want to sue for ACP. Most people will think that they are or why would they say their attorney released that private information.
The A's heard BC very clearly and acted immediately but said nothing about what was being said in court by their daughter's attorney. It's already out there out of the mouths of KC's attorneys, part of the public record and apparently they plan to use it. So where is the A's outrage on this one. jmo
I bet Brad is wishing he had never met them. jmo