I didn't see how they could discuss (or even OBTAIN, for that matter) GA's medical records, given HIPPA laws.
ETA: perhaps a defendant, but certainly not anyone else (GA is just a witness!)
What do they want them for anyway, I wonder.
I didn't see how they could discuss (or even OBTAIN, for that matter) GA's medical records, given HIPPA laws.
ETA: perhaps a defendant, but certainly not anyone else (GA is just a witness!)
Yes - hair in the trunk had it; hair(s) attached to tape did not ERGO the tape went on when she was ALIVE. The hair in the trunk fell out (of the bag or her head) when she had been dead awhile. THUS DuctTape = Murder Weapon.
Oh really??? What evidence was that? I must have missed something.
Bingo - alive when the tape when on and the hair was pulled out....WOW I GET IT NOW!
Oh really??? What evidence was that? I must have missed something.
Fishing expeditionWhat do they want them for anyway, I wonder.
He's not supposed to know what's being said when he's not in the courtroom.
well since both worked together I would assume you tend to adopt "TRASH" as the word of choice, nothing nefarious about it. Of course the DT wanted to find something that wasn't there. lol
What do they want them for anyway, I wonder.
The other thread closed so I am repeating here. Judge Perry makes me smile.
In a movie remake of the trial, what actor do you think would be a good HHJP?
Respectfully Quoted Girlrilla
Yes - hair in the trunk had it; hair(s) attached to tape did not ERGO the tape went on when she was ALIVE. The hair in the trunk fell out (of the bag or her head) when she had been dead awhile. THUS DuctTape = Murder Weapon
What is that older man's name with the great recordable voice...glasses..crap...help me remember folks.:truce: