ohiogirl
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,973
- Reaction score
- 52
Everyone on the DT points out everything that is either missing, not there, or brings up the possibility of something that could've happened. They go as far as to ask about report/file numbers that were never even a part of the case, (today with J. Welsh and the photos) they insinuate that everyone is a f' up at their job even when what they are being accused of is the protocol of their job or something that they are required to do. It is done simply to cast doubt on someone and then the State has to clean up everyone of these little messes. They name innocent people and draw them into this case (ZFG & VT just to name two) it is despicable.
There whole defense is about what is missing and not about what is there...clear as day proof that their client is the only one responsible for Caylee's death and disposal.
I think this is very typical of a trial like this, but does not normally work. SA's are very used to cleaning up testimony after the DT is through, not just here, imo. It is getting really ridiculous here, but it's the nature of the beast.
jmo of course