2011.06.23 Cindy's Testimony

[WillenFan21]

so, apologies in advance if this was touched on but, my fiance' noticed something about LDB's cross exam of cindy tonight. cindy agreed to all of the searches done on march 17th (acetone, chloroform, peroxide), but denied the searches done on march 21st (HOW TO MAKE chloroform, self-defense, etc.) meaning, LDB knew exactly what she was doing and was not caught off guard but instead is preparing for the rebuttal.
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2011/0224/26984466.pdf
scroll to March 17th, 2008.

I am confused. Would you be able to explain what you mean?

 

[barrysgirl]

IIRC, that is established. The user account for GA and CA has all internet history found in an Explorer cache. The RICO223 (correct me if I' m wrong, don't remember exactly) was ICA's and the internet history is Firefox cached.

Didn't Casey give them the password to the Firefox browser over the phone when she was arrested??

Another thing, if CA really did falsify her time and mentally is unable to work, I wonder if the board of nursing is aware of these issues. Not that I'm saying she should lose her license but I'm jsut wondering if her license is still active after being mentally unable to work. hmmm.. I'm going to look....

 

[JusticeSeeker1960]

It makes no sense to me. Why say she searched for chloroform but not for how to make chloroform? Why say she saw a pop up that might have talked about skateboarding at 'break neck speeds" but then deny looking up hand to hand combat or any of the other searches? My thought was that Cindy did the searches on the 17th and Casey did the searches on the 21st, but that does not appear to be what happened. I just don't get the purpose of lying about making half the searches while leave the worst half out there to be used against Casey.

It's not suppose to make sense, just cause reasonable doubt!

 

[TotallyObsessed]

If lying on the witness stand, while under oath is ok....then
lying about a job for 2 years is ok
lying about a nanny is ok
stealing money from your good friend and family is ok
killing your daughter/granddaughter is ok

You say tomato, I say tomahto....All in an Anthony's days work.

 

[Hisimage]

I am confused. Would you be able to explain what you mean?

Look at the post right above your last, hopefully that will help:crazy:

 

[barrysgirl]

She still has a nursing license...

http://ww2.doh.state.fl.us/irm00praes/PRASINDI.ASP?LicId=94605&ProfNBR=1701

 

[Boytwnmom]

that if the computer searches were made then she was home. That's not a "memory" of being home at a specific time. In fact, it's not a memory at all.

The first 1:30 of this video is part of what she testified in court. At about the 50sec mark, CA says that she remembers the 21st because of the computer entries.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...anthony-trial-day-26-20110623,0,1426663.story

 

[mydailyopinions]

Cindy gave a deposition, and she had to adhere to it to not tell a lie under oath. Her testimony was in line with that. LDB questioned Cindy as if she was lying, but if you stop and remove all thoughts of lying while listening, you will note that Linda asks about the searches on the 17th, and cindy confirms she did it. Then the questions about the searches on the 21st were asked about, and Cindy continued to deny that she had searched for those. The web searches on the 21st were more "darning" for the defense. JB thought he pulled a fast one, but the Prosecution knows that Cindy has not changed her story, and they have to do a rebuttal to clarify to the jury.

I'm sorry I'm never quite clear :banghead:. hopefully Mendz can help out here.:blowkiss:

I am understanding- I think.
Question though before I am sure. Were the searches on the 17th done on the User profile? And not Casey's profile?
If so, I am assuming that Cindy did do those searches, and was at home on the 17th (George was off this day) But, in order for Cindy to do these searches, Casey would have logged off of her profile. Cindy admitted that she didn't have to put a password into any profile, but it has been established that Cindy does not know Casey's password.
On to the 21st where the damning searches were done. Were they done on Casey's profile that was password protected? And, don't pass up that on the link above, George and Cindy were at work.

Or,
Cindy has chosen to admit to the searches because she has searched for chlorophyll and it has been known for a while+ remembering a few other searches to keep the defense from blaming George for those searches since he was off of work on the 17th:waitasec:

Did I loose you here?:crazy:

 

[TotallyObsessed]

Just compare one thing....

the frumpy frazzed Cindy on the first day of testimony......and the second time she testified as well......
to that freshly cut hair, freshly botoxed forehead evidenced by the evil eyebrows, the tight fitting dress vs. the loose fitting one she had on previously. She was strutting today. Strutting like a proud peacock.

Sickening.

 

[barrysgirl]

No suprise that Cindy lied remember she destroyed evidence by cleaning the car that smelled liked a dead body..

And we know now that casey had to have cleaned the heck out of that car too. With them finding a blowfly leg, you know the trunk was covered with bugs while caylee laid back there and decayed. GRRRR I HATE HER EVEN MORE TODAY :banghead:

 

[yllek]

YEP - just thinking of IRS requirements!

I own a senior home care company, providing non-medical personal assistance to help seniors live safely at home. Cindy's employer, Gentiva, provides health (medical) home care, so requirements for employees would be even more stringent than for my business. Also, I am located in California which is currently a state that doesn't license/regulate home care, while Florida is regulated and does require a license. I am required to keep all employee time sheet records for 7 years, so Gentiva must have to keep them for at least that long. While most of my employees are hourly caregivers and Cindy appears to have been salaried management, I don't see how reporting that you're working when you are not would be anything but fraud (for which I would terminate immediately).

I don't buy that Cindy was at that home that day anyway, but even if she were, the searches she claims to have been doing weren't work related. Imo, she is either lying now about being at home, or she was lying to her employer about working at home. Even if I were a juror with no knowledge of CA's previous "mistruths", I'd doubt the credibility of her account today.

P.s. Just saw Dr. Drew say he understood and agreed with her explanation about her work records based on his experience in healthcare. (FWIW). Did I miss a reasonable explanation in her testimony? Need to go back and re-read.

 

[KALI]

I do think that Cindy has convinced herself, that she did some of these searches.

I don't think that she was intentionally lying on the stand. We, sluthers, are from the outside looking in.

Cindy, is from the inside looking out.

Yes, It is my opinion that-
Cindy, George, Mallory and Lee are in absolute denial-that Kacey could have killed Caylee.

They are in such denial, that they could watch a video of Casey killing Caylee-and they would still not believe it.

I personally, feel VERY sorry for this entire family. I also, feel extra angry towards Inmate Casey Anthony.

Done

 

[xin]

Just compare one thing....

the frumpy frazzed Cindy on the first day of testimony......and the second time she testified as well......
to that freshly cut hair, freshly botoxed forehead evidenced by the evil eyebrows, the tight fitting dress vs. the loose fitting one she had on previously. She was strutting today. Strutting like a proud peacock.

Sickening.

Maybe Casey *reached out* to her via Jose.

 

[1tasha]

I've only gotton to page 5 on this, and probably won't go any further.

I really can't see how anyone would be surprised at todays turn of events.
So she gets up on the stand the first week and lets it roll.
Once she regained her composure, she has sat silently in the back, madly taking notes with her head buried in her notebook.

I'm as disgusted as the rest of you are, don't get me wrong, but I am not surprised one bit. I wasn't ready to put my guard down on either one of them.

For me it was that I thought there would be some point at which they stopped collaborating in the creation of their own personal nightmares. I really thought incest allegations against--however vaguely stated-- at least their other child would do it.

 

[LancelotLink]

I'm confused.
Casey texts Ricardo at 1:09pm, and someone researched chloroform at 13:43 (is this central time or eastern time?) which was seen on Ricardo's MS page. And CA is worried that the defense is somehow gonna pin this search on George?

 

[Tuffy]

The company HQ could still have a backup, however... I think that is why LDB mentioned it. The individual "branches" (for lack of a better word) probably don't have a backup, but I'd be willing to bet that HQ does. That's the way things were done at the company I used to work for. Also, if Cindy did anything having to do with a patient on those days, at the particular times in question, that would probably still be in the patient records.

Or if she emailed someone, or helped someone, and they noted it. I think she managed the visiting nurses at Gentiva. In the medical field things are documented excessively.

Cindy's work hours were released with discovery documents long ago, showing that she not only worked that day, but she put in OT. She supposedly worked 10 hours.

http://blogs.discovery.com/criminal_report/files/06.pdf

Page 13

 

[Wendy101]

Is Gentiva going to come and testify about Cindy telling the world that the executives ASK their employees to LIE on their time cards? Is her supervisor going to say that YES, she might have filled in and signed an employees time card for her? That is a big fat NO NO, especially in a medical office.

Cindy just threw her boss and her entire company under the bus. And I do not think they are going to ignore that testimony. I have a feeling they are now going to go that extra mile to dig out whatever evidence the SA needs to show Cindy's real hours that day.

Starting to wonder ABOUT CA's hours of in June??

 

[mydailyopinions]

Right now, I am going to swallow my anger from today and give Cindy one last chance.

She did not lie today on the stand, and I am in complete agreement with jschaudt.


Baez will try to impeach Cindy saying she lied, when in fact she didn't lie, it was just the brilliance of the State Attorney doing the questioning that stumped Baez up.

Lord, I hope that is right anyways!

None the less, I do believe that LDB established during this testimony (after watching it for the 3rd time today and removing all thoughts of Cindy lying), that Casey was the only one who could have done the damning searches on the 21st.

 

[mendz]

I am confused. Would you be able to explain what you mean?

can i point you to jschaudt post#777 above? apparently i'm not always that clear either lol

 

[Boytwnmom]

that she worked late/long hours on Mondays. These people aren't even "good" liars.

Or if she emailed someone, or helped someone, and they noted it. I think she managed the visiting nurses at Gentiva. In the medical field things are documented excessively.

Cindy's work hours were released with discovery documents long ago, showing that she not only worked that day, but she put in OT. She supposedly worked 10 hours.

http://blogs.discovery.com/criminal_report/files/06.pdf

Page 13