2011.06.23 Dr. Drew Show discussing Anthony's and talking with Beth T.

[daisy.faithfull]

Regarding how meds could explain CA's memory....

I had a SMALL tendency to disassociate related to early abuse. Started having major incidents of it after I had a head injury and was having seizures.

One of the times they found me walking around like a zombie they did eventually ask me what anti-dep I had been taking. Effexor can affect the memory.

 

[daisy.faithfull]

Because Joran van der Sloot is cut of the same cloth as KC, IMO.

She has to eliminate any competition for the title of the most sick and twisted person?

 

[concentric]

No, because I was saying Joran van der Sloot and KC were very similar.

 

[coloradoteacher]

I really like Mark NeJame- He is right- there are good days and bad days and the SA was ready to indict even before a body was found, so the 31 days and her behavior was enough for him. The forensics are gravy. the SA will find Cindy's work records.

 

[daisy.faithfull]

I am so sick of hearing about poor, grieving grandmother CA and being a victim of ICA. There is only one victim and that is CAYLEE. The rest of the Anthony family are all perpetrators to varying degrees. Not ONE of them have stood up for Caylee and the suffering that beautiful, innocent child endured. Stand UP for justice for Caylee and stand BESIDE your daughter as she faces the punishment for this crime.

I flip back and forth between my thoughts about CA.

Someone somewhere on here said that long time WSers are reserving their opinion on CA and GA until the end of the trial.

I can see where they are coming from and wonder if there is more wisdom in that than my exprssing my opinion. But I started out that way, so in for a dollar......

 

[daisy.faithfull]

Oh, Dr. Drew is all into believing CA because she has a work schedule he can relate to.

Me too.

As the budget really affected things they asked up to carry over ot hours to the next pay period if it will change it to normal hours for that period.

 

[daisy.faithfull]

Yay!!!

BT saying that there is a vortex of lies that people fall into.

I can't tell you how much I admire Beth T.

 

[coloradoteacher]

I flip back and forth between my thoughts about CA.

Someone somewhere on here said that long time WSers are reserving their opinion on CA and GA until the end of the trial.

I can see where they are coming from and wonder if there is more wisdom in that than my exprssing my opinion. But I started out that way, so in for a dollar......

I agree. I cannot place myself in her shoes and I don't know how or what I would do/act if my child did what her child did and was headed for the death penalty. I am upset that she lied. I think she will be caught in her lies. I think the jury understands and knows she is lying like the rest of the planet. I want justice for Caylee and if ICA gets life in prison, I will be happy.

 

[Curious Me]

Jayne Weintrab is very pro-defense on this case. She doesn't make much sense to me. It's like she's blocked out half the facts.

 

[daisy.faithfull]

No, because I was saying Joran van der Sloot and KC were very similar.

I was being sarcastic, I'm sorry. Sarcasm towards ICA's not at all towards you.

 

[Curious Me]

Beth Holloway feels the facts are definitive in that they point to ICA. Thank You, Beth. Sanity!

 

[daisy.faithfull]

I agree. I cannot place myself in her shoes and I don't know how or what I would do/act if my child did what her child did and was headed for the death penalty. I am upset that she lied. I think she will be caught in her lies. I think the jury understands and knows she is lying like the rest of the planet. I want justice for Caylee and if ICA gets life in prison, I will be happy.

I agree. There are more reasons for why CA would lie than ones that she should tell the truth. IMO I strongly believe that that the reasons why CA should tell the truth are so huge they over shadow any reasons why she would lie.

 

[Cherry Ames]

Jayne Weintrab is very pro-defense on this case. She doesn't make much sense to me. It's like she's blocked out half the facts.

She loved Scott Peterson, if I recall.

 

[Curious Me]

Me too.

As the budget really affected things they asked up to carry over ot hours to the next pay period if it will change it to normal hours for that period.

So, you don't get any extra for overtime?

Sorry.

 

[daisy.faithfull]

Jayne Weintrab is very pro-defense on this case. She doesn't make much sense to me. It's like she's blocked out half the facts.

Dr. D has talked about confirmation attribution etc. I think it is either an attempt for the networks needing to maintain the aperance of balanced reporting.

When I see the those that are explaining holes in the Prosecutions case that are so standard (junk science etc), I have to consider that it is a POSSIBILITY that my judgements apply in a bias I have towards the Prosecution. It makes me feel better, I feel that since I can consider how their observations are attribution biased the supporters of the SAs are not basing their opinions in attribution biased.

 

[Curious Me]

The medication CA was taking sure made her remember the neck breaking skate board side site to her chloroform searches. I say that's an incredible memory to explain NECK BREAKING.

 

[daisy.faithfull]

So, you don't get any extra for overtime?

Sorry.

When it can be avoided, yes.

It is exactly like CA is describing. It worries me because you write the adjusted hours on your time sheet. I doubt CA's employer would not know for sure UNLESS THEY HAVE AN UNALTERED SCHEDULE, but my employers would adjust that too. They could testify that they DO do that, but even that is sticky because they would be admitting to something that the big wigs cannot acknowlege publicly.

You do it because it is all the evident that you are needed. They work the least amont of people possible. It is more important that you are there than that you get your ot.

 

[Never4GetCaylee]

Janie Weintraub. Ugh. That woman will argue that Charles Manson was railroaded. :banghead: I wish Beth was given more time. Now Mark Lippman is on saying the same goobledegoop he said on the last 5 shows. :crazy:

 

[Scarlet2]

I flip back and forth between my thoughts about CA.

Someone somewhere on here said that long time WSers are reserving their opinion on CA and GA until the end of the trial.

I can see where they are coming from and wonder if there is more wisdom in that than my exprssing my opinion. But I started out that way, so in for a dollar......

In my daily thoughts about this case I continually play in my mind "there but by the grace of God go I" and that is why in all these years I have kept my comments to myself and thank God every day that I don't have to walk in their shoes.That being said, the anger and disbelief I felt at the end of the Defense's opening statement and the willingness of the defense to "do what ever, by any means" to shift the blame to everyone but KC, well I can't stay silent any longer! I'm all in now!

 

[daisy.faithfull]

Dr. D has talked about confirmation attribution etc. I think it is either an attempt for the networks needing to maintain the aperance of balanced reporting.

When I see the those that are explaining holes in the Prosecutions case that are so standard (junk science etc), I have to consider that it is a POSSIBILITY that my judgements apply in a bias I have towards the Prosecution. It makes me feel better, I feel that since I can consider how their observations are attribution biased the supporters of the SAs are not basing their opinions in attribution biased.

Yup, it would be a huge coincidence. Before this trial when was the last time you searched chloroform? I never did and I think it is reasonable to believe that about many others.